Rant of the Day v2.

General Chit Chat
Message
Author
User avatar
ian16th
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 10029
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
Gender:
Age: 87

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#461 Post by ian16th » Tue Nov 13, 2018 10:18 am

Why is it that you can spend good, hard earned money on nice soft cotton shirts, vest and underpants et al.

Then find that the maker has stitched into the collar or waistband a label denoting the size and washing instructions, and this label is made from hard scratchy man made fibre?

This really, in all senses of the word, IRRITATES me.
Cynicism improves with age

User avatar
OFSO
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 18706
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
Gender:
Age: 80

Only in Spain

#462 Post by OFSO » Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:11 pm

Once upon a time there was a Spanish telcomms firm called Iberbanda. They had a mast in every town and would for a not-inconsiderable monthly sum, erect a microwave antenna on your roof, pointing at the mast many kms away, but giving fairly good broadband internet & phone connection. This is called WiMax and is very successful.

The Spanish telecomms giant Telefonica aka Moviestar didn't like this and bought them out with the object of shutting them down.

In summer 2018 I got a note informing me Iberbanda was closing and telling me I would have to sign up for a Telefonica/Moviestar 3G/4G internet connection through a home mifi box, which I did, and it works. Hooray ! (Made of course by Huawei just like all our phones &etc).

But the monthly bills from Iberbanda kept coming. I phoned Telefonica/Moviestar, couldn't help. (Why not ? You bought Iberbanda, you bastards).

So went to my bank last week and signed a claw-back form, taking back from Iberbanda my last monthly charges.

And what a surprise ! Today a nice man from Iberbanda turned up, removed the dish from my roof, the power supply and wifi modem (which I never used, having bought my own superior one) said good day, and left. Would he have come if I had not clawed back my last payments ?

Friend of mine bought a huge plot in Empuriabrava on which had stood a couple of houses, demolished years before. No utilities connected. But he was surprised to get bills from the electricity and phone people for current use of facilities - which don't exist.

All together now: BASTARDS.

User avatar
Ex-Ascot
Test Pilot
Test Pilot
Posts: 13145
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:16 am
Location: Botswana but sometimes Greece
Gender:
Age: 68

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#463 Post by Ex-Ascot » Wed Nov 14, 2018 10:26 am

Capetonian wrote:
Mon Nov 12, 2018 1:54 pm
1) When I have the misfortune to have to stand in a queue, the person behind me stands DIRECTLY behind me with their nose in the back of my neck. If I step sideways to reduce the proximity, they will also step sideways to remain directly behind me. Apart from farting copiously and odiferously, which I cannot always do on demand, how do I avoid this problem?
Cape, you shout, '*****', or summat along those line. Smartly step back hard onto his foot of your choice and then say, 'did you see the size of that rat', pointing perpendicularly away from the queue. Adding, 'guess his mates will be following soon' may even help you to get to the front of the queue quicker.

If a girlie slightly different. You start rubbing her tits with your back. Or rub your back with the back of your hand over your shoulder presenting the palm to the offenders frontage.

Obviously apologise profusely and say, 'sorry didn't know you were so close behind me. In the SAS we were always taught on parade to stand one arm's length apart.'

If big black guy or big black mamma you may have to accept losing your place in the queue by legging it.
'Yes, Madam, I am drunk, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly.' Sir Winston Churchill.

User avatar
izod tester
Capt
Capt
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:27 pm
Location: Forest of Dean
Gender:
Age: 76

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#464 Post by izod tester » Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:27 pm

Just received a parking charge notice from a company called Parking Eye who administer the car parks at the Royal United Hospital Bath. Mrs IT took her 96 year old mother there last Sunday Week for an MRI scan. MiL has a blue disabled badge which was properly displayed in windscreen. However, badge had recently been renewed by MiL who did not appreciate the need to register the new badge with the Hospital reception (old badge was so registered). Will have to see whether an appeal will work, or whether bureaucrats will adhere to the letter of their small print.

User avatar
boing
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 2714
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:32 am
Location: Beautful Oregon USA
Gender:
Age: 77

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#465 Post by boing » Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:22 pm

Parking Eye and similar outfits simply rent space that people use for parking, put up signs and then make a science and business of trapping people.

Read this:

https://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/parking-eye/
Parking Eye’s operations, and recent litigious behaviour, has resulted in a lot of ill feeling from motorists and consumer organisations. Typically this has been because:

The size of charge is disproportionate to the breach (e.g. is it fair to ‘fine’ someone £100 for overstaying by 20 minutes in a free car park?)
Genuine customers are being ticketed, for example by having a coffee in the supermarket cafe after their shop. Surely it wasn’t these people the land owner was intending to deter?
The rules are not adjusted for older and disabled motorists who understandably take longer to use facilities. In fact, the Equalities Act requires reasonable adjustments to be made
The allowable time is too short (some car parks have limits of only 30 minutes)
They haven’t cancelled tickets for people claiming genuine mitigating circumstances (e.g. illness, breakdowns)
I tangled with one of these vultures near Heathrow, I ignored them and they went away but it looks as though Parking Eye is getting pushy. Complain to the people that employ PE and point out how bad the PR is to them. Getting the local press involved would not hurt either if you want to make the effort.

.
the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible.

User avatar
ian16th
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 10029
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
Gender:
Age: 87

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#466 Post by ian16th » Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:41 pm

Dealing with the NHS in the UK, you are disadvantaged, as you can't easily take your business elsewhere.
Cynicism improves with age

User avatar
4mastacker
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5141
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:38 pm
Location: With the wife
Gender:
Age: 76

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#467 Post by 4mastacker » Wed Nov 14, 2018 6:33 pm

Got stuck in a supermarket queue when one of the tills went into melt-down. One woman put a single item (a newspaper) on the conveyor belt, tried to pay for it by card and asked for fifty quid cash-back. Till refused to play. Checkout supervisor called and started pressing buttons, wiping card to clean the chip, try again, running to other end of the checkout to make phone calls. After waiting over five minutes - I had emptied my trolley onto the conveyer, I decided to move to the adjacent check-out queue. Eventually got my stuff through and was paying for it when the check-out supervisor asked the woman that started the delay the question that should have been asked first "Is your bank card valid?" Turns out the card had expired two years previous and the dozy bat was still carrying it around in her purse.
It's always my fault - SWMBO

User avatar
ian16th
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 10029
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
Gender:
Age: 87

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#468 Post by ian16th » Wed Nov 14, 2018 8:46 pm

4mastacker wrote:
Wed Nov 14, 2018 6:33 pm
Got stuck in a supermarket queue when one of the tills went into melt-down. One woman put a single item (a newspaper) on the conveyor belt, tried to pay for it by card and asked for fifty quid cash-back. Till refused to play. Checkout supervisor called and started pressing buttons, wiping card to clean the chip, try again, running to other end of the checkout to make phone calls. After waiting over five minutes - I had emptied my trolley onto the conveyer, I decided to move to the adjacent check-out queue. Eventually got my stuff through and was paying for it when the check-out supervisor asked the woman that started the delay the question that should have been asked first "Is your bank card valid?" Turns out the card had expired two years previous and the dozy bat was still carrying it around in her purse.
The card reading terminal should have rejected the card and displayed the information.

The expiration date is in the mag stripe.
Cynicism improves with age

Capetonian

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#469 Post by Capetonian » Wed Nov 14, 2018 9:03 pm

I had a strange experience today in a supermarket. Put my CC into the machine at the checkout and it said 'check card'. As I'd used the card twenty minutes earlier to pay for lunch I knew there was nothing wrong with it. I pulled it out an re-inserted it and without even entering the PIN it accepted the charge and the slip was printed out.

The 'contactless' facility is disabled, and the amount was above the limit. The cashier was as surprised as I was.

User avatar
ExSp33db1rd
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 1:51 am
Location: Lesser Antipode
Gender:
Age: 89

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#470 Post by ExSp33db1rd » Wed Nov 14, 2018 10:24 pm

I frequently put my card into the reading gadgets, chip first, then get a message " Swipe card" so do that and get a message "Insert card"
I've just done that, you stupid machine.

It's called progress.

User avatar
ExSp33db1rd
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 1:51 am
Location: Lesser Antipode
Gender:
Age: 89

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#471 Post by ExSp33db1rd » Thu Nov 15, 2018 4:16 am

e-mail failure message.........
>>> xxxxxxxx@yahoo.co.uk (while not connected): 554 5.4.7 [internal]
>>> exceeded max time without delivery
This was a short message, no attachments or photo's.

Getting this with a lot of Yahoo e-mail addresses, Yahoo.co.uk and Yahoo.com

Is it my ISP at fault, or Yahoo ?

Sometimes they go through OK, often not. Irritating.

User avatar
admin
Chief Engineer
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 12:58 am
Location: By a sunny beach on Port Philip Bay.
Gender:
Age: 80

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#472 Post by admin » Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:13 am

There is a whole array of new authentication checks being implemented by major email providers to stop the distribution of spam. If an email doesn't meet all of their new standards then it gets rejected. One of the more significant tasks I have to undertake, almost on a weekly basis, is tweaking the sites email system to ensure emails get through. Some, like AOL, I've given up on. Whilst there are ostensibly "standards", different players are seemingly implementing them differently. Problem most probably is your ISP, Speedy.

Alison

User avatar
4mastacker
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5141
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:38 pm
Location: With the wife
Gender:
Age: 76

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#473 Post by 4mastacker » Thu Nov 15, 2018 7:59 am

ian16th wrote:
Wed Nov 14, 2018 8:46 pm
.....................................

The card reading terminal should have rejected the card and displayed the information.

The expiration date is in the mag stripe.
I went on the supermarket's web-site and told them about my "shopping experience". Got a reply saying that the recently installed tills are new technology and "unfortunately, unforeseen problems do arise". Don't they test these bloody machines before letting them loose on the paying public??
It's always my fault - SWMBO

User avatar
ExSp33db1rd
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 1:51 am
Location: Lesser Antipode
Gender:
Age: 89

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#474 Post by ExSp33db1rd » Thu Nov 15, 2018 8:04 am

No, we have new ones, too. They're hopeless, give errors all the time.

User avatar
ian16th
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 10029
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
Gender:
Age: 87

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#475 Post by ian16th » Thu Nov 15, 2018 8:29 am

4mastacker wrote:
Thu Nov 15, 2018 7:59 am
Don't they test these bloody machines before letting them loose on the paying public??
In these financially stressed times, apparently not.

Today's technique is 'Let it loose on the public, and call it Beta Testing!'

We should all be concerned if the aviation industry starts doing this.

Mind you, looking at the Lion Air incident...........................
Cynicism improves with age

Capetonian

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#476 Post by Capetonian » Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:01 am

And the RR Trent engines?

User avatar
ian16th
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 10029
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
Gender:
Age: 87

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#477 Post by ian16th » Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:34 am

Capetonian wrote:
Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:01 am
And the RR Trent engines?
Are you a RR share holder?

I remember the original RB-211 causing problems, and the 1971 nationalisation!

I was involved with Henry Wiggin that supplied the Nimonic alloy for the turbine blades.
Cynicism improves with age

Magnus
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3484
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 12:42 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Gender:
Age: 71

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#478 Post by Magnus » Thu Nov 15, 2018 1:29 pm

Hospital car parks. Queue for ages, appointment due, and the machine eventually issues a ticket. OK, so now I'm on the clock. Take ticket, drive round 3 times, no spaces other than disabled. Now late for appointment, open wound in foot, paying for non-existent parking space, park in disabled space so I can limp in late. Get bollocking from attendant. Apparently, I'm supposed to drive round forever looking for a "regular" space, as their system only counts total cars and total spaces and can't differentiate between able and disabled spaces. I fekn hate PFI hospitals.

User avatar
CharlieOneSix
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5023
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:58 pm
Location: NE Scotland
Gender:
Age: 79

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#479 Post by CharlieOneSix » Thu Nov 15, 2018 1:51 pm

Hacked off!! Just to be sure we wouldn't be late I left 50 minutes for a 30 minute drive into Aberdeen for the funeral of a friend. Got stuck in a tailback of traffic on the A90 dual carriageway some three miles from the Church for 1 hour and 20 minutes due to unannounced road works on the single carriageway Bridge of Dee. No side roads available to escape. Really upset that we missed the service. That bridge dates from 1527 and was widened in 1841. It's totally inadequate for today's traffic yet can't be touched as it's listed! ~X(

It was obviously beyond the wit of Aberdeen Council to make the bridge one way today and send the opposing traffic to the next bridge. X(
The helicopter pilots' mantra: If it hasn't gone wrong then it's just about to...
https://www.glenbervie-weather.org

Capetonian

Re: Rant of the Day v2.

#480 Post by Capetonian » Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:03 pm

I am a RR shareholder as it happens(about £12000 of shares). Just wondering why you asked!

Post Reply