Royal bloomers, anyone?

General Chit Chat
Message
Author
User avatar
TheGreenGoblin
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17596
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#21 Post by TheGreenGoblin » Sun Jan 19, 2020 5:58 am

Slasher wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:52 am
Click on ‘foof’ above to see Hadley F my good man.

I just find it funny that one foof owner will comment on another’s in a public newspaper! :))
I guess if one owns a foof it gives some legitimacy in commenting on another's! :)

Being foofless I cannot comment further.
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."

Slasher

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#22 Post by Slasher » Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:36 pm

Yeh Gob but imagine you started an upmarket range of aromatic votive candles called Essence du Cocque Goblín and flogged ‘em off at Harrods, and I then went and wrote an article in the Daily Mail about yer slug! :p

Hydromet
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4397
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:55 am
Location: SE Oz
Gender:

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#23 Post by Hydromet » Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:58 am

Slash, I reckon just watching you do the research would be worth paying for.

Slasher

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#24 Post by Slasher » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:20 am

.. =))

User avatar
4mastacker
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5141
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:38 pm
Location: With the wife
Gender:
Age: 76

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#25 Post by 4mastacker » Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:34 am

Will "foof" replace the C-word in polite conversation? Calling a person a "foof" does have a certain soft ring to it.
It's always my fault - SWMBO

User avatar
TheGreenGoblin
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17596
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#26 Post by TheGreenGoblin » Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:38 pm

Slasher wrote:
Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:36 pm
Yeh Gob but imagine you started an upmarket range of aromatic votive candles called Essence du Cocque Goblín and flogged ‘em off at Harrods, and I then went and wrote an article in the Daily Mail about yer slug! :p
Trouble is an Essence du Cocque Goblin candle would probably smell like an Abbo's arse and nobody would buy it, particularly after a bloke called Slasher wrote about me nethers!

Now a Chateau de Cocque Goblin might just make the list of good Aussie wines... although some might just think I am taking the piss!

Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."

Hydromet
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4397
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:55 am
Location: SE Oz
Gender:

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#27 Post by Hydromet » Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:41 pm

There are parts of Sydney, along Oxford St., say, where Cocque Goblin is quite popular (so I'm told.)

Slasher

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#28 Post by Slasher » Tue Jan 21, 2020 4:18 am

TheGreenGoblin wrote:
Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:38 pm
particularly after a bloke called Slasher wrote about me nethers!

Now a Chateau de Cocque Goblin might just make the list of good Aussie wines...
THE GUARDIAN

What’s so special about The Green
Goblin’s penis? Absolutely nothing!

Rod KF
20 January 2020

With the recent abject failure of the Essence de la Cocque du Goblín (he couldn’t even get the French right!) Mr Goblin has embarked now on a Chateau wine which supposedly produces
an aroma of his nethers. Critics have already given it a thumbs down and describe it as a collection of smells including that of
a scouser’s jock strap and flyblown cheese. Reportly produced
in the Stellenbosch wine region, top sources there say nay.
But apart from that what’s special about Mr Goblin’s testicular penilery anyway? What is it that he feels there is a market for
its olfactory value? So this reporter went along to his modest
home to find out.
To be honest it really doesn’t look too bad for its age. A slight crinkling and it appears to have seen some combat action. Of this Mr Goblin declined to discuss with me. Overall...his dong
was not overly impressive upon first viewing and his danglies
did indeed dangle for quite some distance downwards. If I was
gay I’d probably in time learn to like it. As a sculptor I’d most
likely learn ways to appreciate it.

D5BBC79A-2C95-42A4-A952-5C7CF6BF190B.jpeg
Mr Goblin’s penis. A wholly unremarkable instrument.

The sniff examination was marginal at best. It was obvious he
had raided his partner’s perfume chest prior to this interview much as the Gwyneth Paltrow had done when her foofery was similarly examined (I haven’t sniffed Ms Paltrow’s vagina but if you’ve sniffed one snatch in my opinion you’ve sniffed ‘em all).
It was at this point that Mr Goblin asked his partner to bring out
his latest underpant contribution to the laundry hamper.
Now the truth was revealed. From over four metres away the smell threw me into such an ague, similar to what that trader endured as he was stirring his soup in Shakespeare’s Merchant
of Venice. I was visibly shaken and felt quite stressed. Mr Goblin then arose from his seat, fished out his deplorable undies, and donned them. He asked me to then do the test olfactorily from five centimtres distance.
I could not. One overwhelming whiff from still over four metres away was enough to cause even the most hardened underground sewerage worker to cry like a little girl in agony.

9C969ABA-4980-42D3-9F9A-75C72956D954.jpeg
9C969ABA-4980-42D3-9F9A-75C72956D954.jpeg (23.1 KiB) Viewed 136 times
It is Mr Goblin’s underwear that creates the vaunted aroma.

It would not be beyond anyone’s credence that he simply squashes grapes out the back with his feet and sluices the
juices through his used undies into the bottles.

I suppose I can close in saying that Mr Goblin might have a
wine market along Sydney’s Oxford Street for the aroma of
his used underwear, but as for his naughty bits I say...good
luck with that!

The writer is an independent author and does not necessarily represent the views of The Guardian, but in this case...it does!

User avatar
TheGreenGoblin
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17596
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#29 Post by TheGreenGoblin » Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:37 am

For once I am rendered speechless! Let it be known that the proprietors of the Goblin Estates are currently consulting with their lawyers in pursuit of a retraction from the Guardian for this scurrilous attack on the provenance, bouquet and firm, and not at all astringent, beauty of the Essence de la Cocque du Goblín. Failing a retraction, damages will be sought from the Guardian, In addition a claim for damages to cover the cost of the Green Goblin's keyboard, destroyed by virtue of tea, through the nose, as a result of infamous elephant trick, as he read the scurrilous piece, will also be be sought.

NB - The lawyers also note the intimation of that French word for petrol, namely essence, which is a direct and unwarranted criticism/slur against the delicate flavour of the product and will form a part of the ensuing claim.
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."

User avatar
TheGreenGoblin
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17596
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#30 Post by TheGreenGoblin » Tue Jan 21, 2020 4:28 pm

The scene at the offices of well know City lawyers Chatem, Cheatem and Run this morning after preliminary discussion ref. la affaire de la Cocque du Goblín prior to a long lunch washed down with Pinot Grigio Alto Adige!

Chatem, Cheatem and Run.JPG
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."

Slasher

Re: Royal bloomers, anyone?

#31 Post by Slasher » Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:54 am

In view of the impending legal proceedings to be brought to bear against an English newspaper, I’ve been instructed by the Guardian to publish a full retraction of the blatant slander I recently made to one, The Green Goblin, concerning his genitalia and underwear stinkery.
THE GUARDIAN

Public Notices:
23 January 2020

All right, all right, I apologise. I’m
really sorry! I’m really really sorry,
I apologise unreservedly and take it
back. I offer a complete and utter
retraction. The imputation was totally
without basis in fact, and was in no
way fair comment, and was motivated
purely by malice, and I deeply regret
any distress that my comments may
have caused you, or your family, and I
hereby undertake not to repeat any
such slander at any time in the future.

- Rod KF (author of the offending article
published 20 January 2020
Further, I will have no hesitation in apologising to him personally, in whatever manner and location he, or his lawyers, deem fit.

The Guardian envisages this similar to the following scenario, and I hereby state I will indemnify the newspaper should any slippage occur from the plaintiff’s arms.



Post Reply