Drivers wanted, now is it a lack of priori or a posteriori reasoning, leading to the need for new drivers after two absolutely preventable accidents based upon the existence of practical previous experience (one of our buses crashed at the bridge before) as well as theoretical knowledge (how high are the local bridges and how tall are our buses), that points to the cause of this recent accident?
I note from C16's earlier post that the poor driver in this case has had a long and hitherto unblemished driving record. Methinks one might look to the ops management at this company for the essential faults in its modus operandi.