Was the airline right? in my book yes
-
prospector
- Capt
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:37 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Gender:
- Age: 84
-
Capetonian
Re: Were thr airline right? in my book yes
There are some inconsistencies in the 'story' and it doesn't quite ring true.
Flight Centre, a bunch of scammers that bring disrepute to the travel industry, were involved.
I would be very reluctant to pass judgement here for or against the airline without knowing the facts - and that will never happen.
Flight Centre, a bunch of scammers that bring disrepute to the travel industry, were involved.
I would be very reluctant to pass judgement here for or against the airline without knowing the facts - and that will never happen.
-
TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: Were thr airline right? in my book yes
I don't know mate. The girl in the middle has a nice smile. 
As I pilot I guess we have a weight and balance problem here "par excellence"...
Edited later - I am with Capetonian on this one.
As I pilot I guess we have a weight and balance problem here "par excellence"...
Edited later - I am with Capetonian on this one.
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
-
prospector
- Capt
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:37 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Gender:
- Age: 84
Re: Was the airline right? in my book yes
I would have said the most relevant fact is obvious in the photo, and explained very well in the article.
Safety belts with built in pneumatic explosive bags cannot be stretched, or extended, or added to.
Safety belts with built in pneumatic explosive bags cannot be stretched, or extended, or added to.
Re: Was the airline right? in my book yes
They've got their own built-in safety padding.
The real failure is that somewhere during the booking process there should have been a prominent notice about the maximum size of person allowed in that class of seat.
The real failure is that somewhere during the booking process there should have been a prominent notice about the maximum size of person allowed in that class of seat.
-
Slasher
Re: Was the airline right? in my book yes
Those goddamn bloody Thais.
Love it!
Love it!
THAI AIRWAYS WISH TO ANNOUNCE THAT FOR ITS ROYAL SILK BUSINESS CLASS THERE IS A SET LIMIT OF 200 KG FOR EACH OBESE FAT SLOB DUE TO THE LIMITING NOSE UP TRIM THE AIRCRAFT STAB SYSTEM HAS AVAILABLE FOR TAKEOFF. OBJECTIONABLY FAT PEOPLE MAY REBOOK IN ECONOMY CLASS WHERE THEY BELONG OR GO AND TAKE A BARGE. ANY INCONVENIENCE SHOULD BE REGRETTED BY THE OFFENSIVE PASSENGER(S) CONCERNED.
-
Pontius Navigator
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Was the airline right? in my book yes
On our TransAtlantic cruise flights there is a premium economy. We were only able to book seats there once as the above mentioned fat slobs book as soon as the bookings open. In addition to being FS they are often disgusting pigs consuming both carry on duty free and the extra booze provided in premium economy.
On one medium haul flight was an outsized woman wheeled on board in an outsized wheel chair. We were at the front with a spare seat. I just glared and the gentleman in the row behind kindly made room.
Fanny Phatarsee thought it was a joke.
On one medium haul flight was an outsized woman wheeled on board in an outsized wheel chair. We were at the front with a spare seat. I just glared and the gentleman in the row behind kindly made room.
Fanny Phatarsee thought it was a joke.