American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

Post Reply
Message
Author
TheGreenAnger
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3286
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the Western Spiral

American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#1 Post by TheGreenAnger » Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:26 pm

Commercial supersonic transatlantic travel is on course to roar back almost 20 years after Concorde was decommissioned.

American Airlines on Tuesday agreed to buy up to 20 ultrafast jets from the aviation startup Boom Supersonic, with an option to purchase 40 more.

The Overture jets, which promise speeds of up to Mach 1.7 over water – twice the speed of today’s fastest commercial aircraft – are expected to roll off the production line from 2025 and carry the first passengers in 2029.

American is the third airline to place an order for the jets, following United Airlines which ordered 15 last year, and Virgin Atlantic which reached a deal in 2016.

Blake Scholl, the founder and chief executive of Boom, said: “We believe Overture can help American deepen its competitive advantage on network, loyalty and overall airline preference through the paradigm-changing benefits of cutting travel times in half.”

The Overture will carry fewer passengers than subsonic passenger jets, with 65 to 88 seats – less capacity than Concorde had – which will initially be priced at business class rates.

Neither Boom nor the airlines have released expected prices, but Scholl previously told the Guardian tickets would be “affordable”.

He said: “I started this because I was sad that I never got to fly on Concorde. I waited but no one was doing it, so I decided to. Ultimately I want people to be able to get anywhere in the world in five hours for $100. To get there you have to improve fuel efficiency, but step by step supersonic air travel will become available for everyone. This is supersonic passenger air travel, no *****, and it’s actually affordable.”

Derek Kerr, American’s chief financial officer, said: “Looking to the future, supersonic travel will be an important part of our ability to deliver for our customers. We are excited about how Boom will shape the future of travel both for our company and our customers.”

Boom says the new aircraft is designed for a range of 4,250 nautical miles, and could fly about 600 routes around the world. It estimates that flying from London to Miami would take just under five hours, compared with almost nine hours by current means.

Under the terms of the agreement, Boom must meet industry-standard operating, performance and safety requirements as well as American’s other customary conditions before delivery of any Overtures.

Concorde, which was flown by Air France and British Airways, was retired in 2003 after 27 years of service.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... sonic-jets
My necessaries are embark'd: farewell. Adieu! I have too grieved a heart to take a tedious leave.

ribrash

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#2 Post by ribrash » Tue Aug 16, 2022 8:36 pm

It will never happen.

PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 8320
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 69

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#3 Post by PHXPhlyer » Tue Aug 16, 2022 8:50 pm

American Airlines cuts 31,000 flights from its November schedule #-o

This move should give them plenty of extra room to slot 20 more planes into their schedule. :))

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/amer ... index.html

(CNN) — American Airlines is once again cutting its flight schedule, slashing 16% or 31,000 flights during November, according to data from Cirium, an aviation analytics company.
The airline said the move is "in line with our approach to network and schedule planning throughout the year."
Schedule data provided by Cirium shows the largest cuts are between Chicago O'Hare and Dallas-Fort Worth, as well as between Boston and Philadelphia.
"Preliminary schedules are published 331 days in advance and then adjustments are made closer in based on the schedule we intend to operate," American said to CNN in a statement. "We are now loading schedule adjustments approximately 100 days in advance, which is in line with how we adjusted our schedule in 2019 prior to the pandemic."
Last week, CNN reported that American is cutting 2% of its flights in September and October.

American Airlines called the changes "proactive adjustments" in order to "size our airline for the resources we have available and to build additional buffer into the remainder of our summer schedule."
Airlines make changes based on factors such as demand forecasts or staffing, said Mike Arnot, an industry commentator and spokesman for Cirium.
"For passengers, the impact might be negligible; instead of 15 flights a day between Dallas and Chicago, there might be nine flights but with more bums in the seats," Arnot said.
American isn't the only US airline to trim its schedule.
United Airlines recently cut its schedule at Newark, New Jersey, and Delta cut its summer schedule early in the season.

Airlines have been struggling with flight cancellations and delays this summer as they face staffing shortages, severe weather and air traffic control delays. Last week, an unexpected line of storms at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport caused 100 American Airlines flight diversions and hundreds of cancellations.
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg recently called the air travel system "very brittle" and proposed new consumer protections for passengers.

PP

TheGreenAnger
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3286
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the Western Spiral

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#4 Post by TheGreenAnger » Wed Aug 17, 2022 6:26 am

ribrash wrote:
Tue Aug 16, 2022 8:36 pm
It will never happen.
I would have been apt to agree with you some months back but Northrop Grumman's participation in the venture gives me pause for some optimism.

https://boomsupersonic.com/news/post/no ... and-allies
My necessaries are embark'd: farewell. Adieu! I have too grieved a heart to take a tedious leave.

User avatar
Ex-Ascot
Test Pilot
Test Pilot
Posts: 13125
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:16 am
Location: Botswana but sometimes Greece
Gender:
Age: 68

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#5 Post by Ex-Ascot » Wed Aug 17, 2022 8:21 am

I have a feeling that this will happen. Not on schedule of course. We have been without supersonic passenger jets for too long now.
'Yes, Madam, I am drunk, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly.' Sir Winston Churchill.

G-CPTN
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 7631
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 11:22 pm
Location: Tynedale
Gender:
Age: 79

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#6 Post by G-CPTN » Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:46 pm

Are the fuel economics viable?

How many passengers will they carry and how much will the fares need to be?
Are there sufficient people prepared to pay that amount?

User avatar
Ex-Ascot
Test Pilot
Test Pilot
Posts: 13125
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:16 am
Location: Botswana but sometimes Greece
Gender:
Age: 68

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#7 Post by Ex-Ascot » Fri Aug 19, 2022 3:43 pm

Yes, 80 and they think that they can just charge normal business class fare.
'Yes, Madam, I am drunk, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly.' Sir Winston Churchill.

TheGreenAnger
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3286
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the Western Spiral

Part 1- American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#8 Post by TheGreenAnger » Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:10 pm

An analysis of the state of the current SST market.
Several developers – with Boom in the vanguard – are promising a return to supersonic air travel before the decade is out. Sound is just one of the barriers they need to break to make their dream a reality.

Almost 20 years after Concorde completed its final passenger flight, the aircraft its developer insists will be its more successful successor is edging closer to commercial reality – if not exactly at great speed. Four years ago, Boom Supersonic was suggesting its Mach 1.7 Overture airliner would be in operation in 2023. Now it is slating service entry for the very end of the decade.

At July’s Farnborough air show, the US start-up unveiled the latest design for the Overture – the initial concept of which it had revealed five years ago. It insists that the now four-engined jet, which has a longer wingspan and a more contoured fuselage than its earlier form, will be ready to begin flight testing in 2026, with flight trials on a scaled-down supersonic demonstrator, the XB-1, due later this year.

Boom is also eyeing an additional market for the Overture, announcing at Farnborough a partnership with Northrop Grumman to develop a special mission variant for surveillance or transport duties, targeted at the USA and its allies. Boom founder and chief executive Blake Scholl claims the version will offer “paradigm-changing capabilities” to military operations.

If it were down to confidence and industry endorsements alone, there would be no doubt about Boom’s ambitions to become the first privately-funded airliner developer for decades. The Colorado-based business had a major presence at Farnborough, with a high-profile reveal of the new model. It also confirmed Collins, Eaton and Safran as its latest programme partners.

Boom signed in 2021 a “purchase agreement” with United Airlines for 15 Overtures, with 35 additional options, and followed that up on 16 August this year with an order from United’s rival American Airlines for 20 examples, plus 40 options, backed by undisclosed “non-refundable deposits”. Japan Airlines was the first to commit to the Overture back in 2017, investing $10 million in a “pre-order” arrangement for 20 aircraft.

The sudden May 2021 collapse of fellow supersonic aircraft developer Aerion extinguished some of the thrilling promise of a new supersonic era. The US firm had been developing its pencil-shaped AS2 business jet for 15 years and had big name programme partners on board, including Boeing, Collins and GE Aviation.

Like Boom – which is building its new factory in Greensboro, North Carolina – Aerion had begun work on a site for its global headquarters, in its case the growing aviation industrial hub of Melbourne, Florida. It had also secured a marquee customer, fractional ownership operator NetJets. However, like so many start-ups, it simply ran out of cash and could not secure fresh investment.

DEVELOPING IDEAS
Scholl, who founded Boom eight years ago, says he was “sad it didn’t work out for Aerion, as we all want to see more companies developing great ideas”. However, he insists that its business model was very different to Boom’s, and that its decision to focus on the ultra-high-net-worth market was a “step in the wrong direction”.


This is because, he says, 80% of private flights are short-haul and over land, where the sonic boom is a problem. Most Overture services, by contrast, will cater for the long-distance business traveller and spend the bulk of their time over oceans, where the noise is less of an issue. “There are hundreds of city pairs that have routing that is sufficiently over water,” says Scholl.

The 4,250nm (8.000km)-range, 64- to 80-seater will travel at M1.7 over water, but at subsonic speeds over land, avoiding a sonic boom. The roar created when it flew over populated areas was one of the reasons the Aerospatiale/BAC Concorde remained banned in many jurisdictions, effectively preventing it establishing a market beyond the North Atlantic.

The Overture’s main benefit is that it will be a “jetlag killer” on long-haul flights, asserts Scholl, who cites the example of an executive travelling from San Francisco to Tokyo (a key United route), who would “save a whole day” on a round trip. Likewise, even on a relatively short flight, such as Hong Kong to Tokyo, a passenger could fulfil a business commitment in a day.

He likens the Overture’s potential to transform travel patterns to the transition from propeller aircraft to jets in the 1960s, when the likes of Hawaii became a tourist destination for millions of mainland North Americans. “If the flight is 10-20% faster, it doesn’t really change things. If we double the speed of flight, we can take days off,” he says.

PRICE MATCHING
Another difference with Aerion is that Scholl insists he can make M1.0-plus travel “accessible to anyone who flies”. While he may not quite envisage a supersonic Ryanair, he reckons fares will match the price of business class seats today. Moreover, he believes he can do all this sustainably, by using advanced materials and an aerodynamic design to create a zero-net-carbon aircraft.

Boom rolled out its XB-1 demonstrator in October 2021 and, although it has not yet flown, Scholl says it had completed 80% of its ground trials by Farnborough and is almost ready to take to the air. However, he does not plan a public countdown to the event. “We will announce it when it has just happened,” he declares.

Scaled-down XB-1 demonstrator will enter flight trials this year

Scholl says Boom is “the only non-government entity to have rolled out and tested a supersonic jet”, a reference to the hundreds of millions of dollars of French and UK taxpayers’ money poured into the development of Concorde six decades ago. The supersonic jet first flew in 1969 and entered service in 1976.

However, if there is a compelling need for speed, why has no big airframer gone down that route? Airbus – which inherited the DNA of Aerospatiale – never replaced Concorde. Boeing and Dassault – despite their deep knowledge of supersonic military jets – have never been seriously tempted. Boeing abandoned its closest attempt – the subsonic Sonic Cruiser – at concept.

Given that the technology behind supersonic propulsion has been around since Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier three-quarters of a century ago, Scholl has a simple response. “Airbus and Boeing have higher priorities and developing a supersonic jet would undermine their cash cow widebody market,” he says. “Boom has all the advantages of existing for a singular purpose.”


While Boom announced a number of new programme partners at Farnborough, one quite crucial absentee was an engine supplier. Two years ago, Boom announced “an engagement agreement” to “explore the pairing of a Rolls-Royce propulsion system”, and particularly whether one of the UK manufacturer’s existing powerplants could be adapted for supersonic flight.

R-R, with its French industrial partner Snecma (now Safran), was, of course, responsible for the Olympus 593 engines that powered Concorde. Speaking ahead of the Farnborough show, Scholl said that while he is “happy with how [the R-R] talks are going”, no decision on a powerplant has been made.

Boom already has a relationship with GE Aviation, with the XB-1 powered by three legacy J85-15 military jet engines. However, GE appeared to close its door on the supersonic market when it cancelled the Affinity, a new medium-bypass product it was developing exclusively for Aerion.

Following Aerion’s demise, Boom is the only supersonic aircraft developer whose plans have advanced beyond renderings and impressive claims on websites, but at least three other businesses have designs on entering the market this decade: Exosonic, Spike Aerospace, and space tourism pioneer Virgin Galactic.


The unique selling point of Spike’s S-512, a twin-engined M1.6 commercial jet, is that its aerodynamic features will guarantee the absence of a loud sonic boom on the ground, the company says. Although Spike has not issued any updates for around a year, founder Vic Kachoria says there have been changes to the design that he plans to talk about “in the coming months”.

As with Boom and virtually every start-up aircraft developer, Spike has in the past announced wildly ambitious timelines for its programme; for instance, it said in 2017 that deliveries of the S-512 would start by 2023. Its last major announcement, in February last year, was of a partnership with Indian company Tech Mahindra, which will assist Spike with stress analysis and fuselage work.
My necessaries are embark'd: farewell. Adieu! I have too grieved a heart to take a tedious leave.

TheGreenAnger
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3286
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the Western Spiral

Part 2 - American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#9 Post by TheGreenAnger » Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:13 pm

QUIET PROGRESS
In May this year, Exosonic said it had completed a “conceptual design review” of its 70-seater “quiet supersonic airliner”. The start-up also said it had “recently” secured $4 million in a funding round that it will use to employ more staff and establish an office. Exosonic claims “supersonic jets capable of quiet, overland flight will eventually make existing subsonic aircraft obsolete”.

The Los Angeles-based company is unusually developing an unmanned supersonic aircraft as a “stepping stone” to its commercial supersonic airliner. It says the unmanned aircraft, which it hopes to fly at the “earliest in 2025” will meet a short term need for “affordable” adversarial air combat training, and “de-risk” the passenger effort.

Virgin Galactic unveiled its design for a delta wing supersonic jet capable of reaching M3.0 and carrying 19 passengers in August 2020, announcing also that it was working with R-R on “developing engine propulsion technology for high-speed commercial aircraft”. Since then details have been sparse, as the company has focused on its sub-orbital space tourism efforts.

NASA and Lockheed Martin are also due to fly this year their X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology Demonstrator, and collect public feedback on “acceptability of a quiet sonic boom generated by the unique design of an aircraft”. Lockheed says the data will allow regulators to establish an “acceptable commercial supersonic noise standard” for supersonic flights over land.

For these would-be players in a new supersonic air travel market, cracking the technology is just one battle in a long campaign. As many would-be disruptors have discovered – and will continue to discover – the real struggle is finding funds to bring the design into production. The money to run an assembly line dwarfs the cost of paying a few bright engineers working on a prototype in a hangar.

Fifteen to 20 years ago, a wave of very light jets (VLJs) arrived on the market, with the companies behind them promising to lower the high entry barriers to private jet travel. Virtually all of them fell at the financial hurdle, with the highest profile collapse perhaps Eclipse Aerospace. Today, at least a dozen start-ups are behind a similar raft of electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) designs.

As with VLJs, established aerospace companies are funding some of these pioneers – Embraer in the case of Eve, and Boeing with Wisk. However, Boeing admitted last year that it had burned its fingers investing in Aerion. “We evaluated it year in and year out, and got to a decision where we didn’t believe in it quite as much as we thought we could,” said chief executive David Calhoun.

Others have managed to catch the eye of former Silicon Valley billionaires or Wall Street speculators keen to be early financial adopters of the Next Big Thing. The new breed of supersonic developers have found themselves fishing in that same pool, but it is one that is finite and showing signs of becoming smaller as stock prices of some eVTOL companies fail to live up to early promise.

BREAKTHROUGH MODES
Of all the potentially breakthrough aviation modes – urban air mobility, electric, hybrid-electric or hydrogen propulsion, and even space tourism – developing a supersonic airliner is one of the most challenging, from a technological and a financial point of view. For Boom and its rivals, the hardest years of prototyping, flight-testing, certification, production and supporting customers are ahead.

That is just delivery. What about demand? Will enough airlines be convinced of the business case around offering customers on certain routes a journey time half that of conventional airliners? How would Airbus and Boeing respond to such a threat to their traditional market?

Finally, how does an airliner burning fuel at supersonic speed fit in an era when the industry is increasingly focusing on its carbon footprint? None of that, it seems, dampens the conviction of the supersonic start-ups that they can change air travel and by the 2030s – for the first time in a generation – restore the ability for airline passengers to reach their destinations at faster than the speed of sound.
https://www.flightglobal.com/aerospace/ ... 90.article
My necessaries are embark'd: farewell. Adieu! I have too grieved a heart to take a tedious leave.

TheGreenAnger
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3286
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the Western Spiral

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#10 Post by TheGreenAnger » Thu Sep 08, 2022 8:19 pm

The whole Boom development programme and flight readiness schedule has been thrown into doubt by this news.

https://www.flightglobal.com/airframers ... 11.article

Rolls-Royce has ended its involvement in a project by Boom Supersonic to develop a faster-than-sound passenger airliner, leaving unclear the powerplant options available to Boom.

“We are appreciative of Rolls-Royce’s work over the last few years, but it became clear that Rolls’ proposed engine design and legacy business model is not the best option for Overture’s future airline operators or passengers,” Boom said on 7 September.

“Later this year, we will announce our selected engine partner and our transformational approach for reliable, cost-effective and sustainable supersonic flight.”

Earlier in the day, news broke that R-R had backed out of the Boom project. “We’ve completed our contract with Boom and delivered various engineering studies for their Overture supersonic programme,” the UK engine manufacturer says.

”After careful consideration, Rolls-Royce has determined that the commercial aviation supersonic market is not currently a priority for us and, therefore, will not pursue further work on the programme at this time. It has been a pleasure to work with the Boom team and we wish them every success in the future.”

Boom, with offices in Denver, has been developing a supersonic aircraft called Overture that it says will carry up to 80 passengers and cruise at Mach 1.7. It initially intended for Overture to have two engines, but recently changed to a four-engined design.

The company has been targeting first flight of Overture in 2026 and first delivery in 2029.

“Overture remains on track to carry passengers in 2029, and we are looking forward to making our engine announcement later this year,” Boom says.

The company had also said it would fly a demonstrator supersonic aircraft called XB-1 in 2021, though that aircraft’s first flight remains unfulfilled.

News of R-R’s retreat comes as the aerospace industry faces immense pressure to cut carbon emissions.

Supersonic aircraft are less efficient per passenger than subsonic types, though Boom has countered that Overture will burn sustainable aviation fuel, offsetting its carbon footprint to “net zero”. Still, real uncertainty exists about the availability and environmental benefits of such alternative fuels.

Despite environmental concerns, Boom’s concept has the caught attention of major carriers, including United Airlines and American Airlines, which agreed to purchase the jet.

Boom has also been working to secure more funding for the incredibly expensive work of bringing a new jetliner to market.

Michel Merluzeau, an aerospace analyst with consultancy AIR, describes Boom’s project as an imperfect fit for R-R.

He calls Boom an “expensive and risky endeavour” that faces regulatory hurdles, and says R-R is best served deploying its resources to safer, more-lucrative projects, such as developing engines for the next commercial airliner from Airbus or Boeing.

R-R and Boom disclosed their partnership in 2020. Boom said R-R would “explore” pairing an engine with Overture. The companies would form teams to study various options, including those using existing engine architectures.

“The goal of the new agreement is to work together to identify the propulsion system that would complement Boom’s Overture airframe,” it said in 2020.

R-R has history of making engines for supersonic jets. Decades ago it partnered with Snecma – now Safran Aircraft Engines – to produce the Concorde’s Olympus 593 powerplants.

With R-R out, Boom’s propulsion options for Overture are unclear. The company could potentially attempt to partner with GE Aviation.

That engine maker had been developing its Infinity engine to power a supersonic aircraft under development by a company called Aerion. In May 2021, however, Aerion folded amid financial issues.

GE Aviation did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

My necessaries are embark'd: farewell. Adieu! I have too grieved a heart to take a tedious leave.

TheGreenAnger
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 3286
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the Western Spiral

Re: American orders 20 Supersonic aircraft from Boom

#11 Post by TheGreenAnger » Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:54 am

One wonders if GE will be minded to recommence development of the General Electric Affinity engine, discontinued when Aerion went bust. I suspect not!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_Affinity
Development
At the May 2017 EBACE, Aerion announced its selection of GE Aviation to power the Aerion AS2 supersonic business jet. GE then launched the Affinity program. The final engine configuration is a core with billions of operational hours – suggesting the CFM56 – and a new low-pressure section optimised for supersonic speed. The Affinity high-pressure core is adapted from the CFM56 and the GE F101/F110 military engines.

In February 2018, Aerion released the GE engine configuration. Thrust will be reduced at takeoff to meet Chapter 5 noise regulations, requiring a longer balanced field takeoff as an acceptable compromise. Chapter 5 applies from 2018 to over 120,000 lb (54,400 kg) aircraft and all aircraft from 2021. The initial design of its Affinity medium-bypass-ratio turbofan was completed by October 2018. Its detailed design review was to be completed by 2020 for the first prototype production.

Following the collapse of Aerion on 21 May 2021, GE Aviation discontinued development of the Affinity engine, leaving Rolls-Royce as the sole supersonic powerplant provider for the Boom Overture.

Design
GE Aviation needs to develop a configuration accommodating reasonably well requirements for supersonic speed, subsonic speed and noise levels. Managing the high intake temperatures at high altitudes is a key challenge for the initial design. An engine for supersonic flight needs a lower bypass ratio than modern turbofans, having a higher flow speed for better efficiency. This is limited by noise regulations at takeoff, and a lower compression core like the CFM56 is better suited to higher temperatures encountered supersonically. The engine is a compromise between a big core for power and a small fan for wave drag, and Mach 1.4 is a compromise between higher speed and enough range.

The high-pressure core is derived from the nine-stage compressor and single-stage turbine of the CFM56, matched to a new low-pressure section optimised for supersonic speed with a 133 cm (52in) diameter fan instead of the 155-173 cm (61-68.3in) fan of the 6:1 bypass ratio CFM56. The twin-shaft, twin-fan engine with FADEC has a service ceiling of 18,300 m (60,000 ft). It lacks an afterburner, and has a combustor with advanced coatings and uses additive manufacturing technologies.

The 18,000 lbf (80 kN) GE Affinity has a nine-stage HP compressor, a single-stage HP turbine and a two-stage low-pressure turbine. Preceded by fixed inlet guide vanes with movable flaps, the twin blisk fans have wide-chord titanium blades. The exhaust mixer is similar to the GE Passport ceramic matrix composite design. The Mach 1.4-to-1.6 speed requires no variable-geometry inlet and the variable-area nozzle has a cone moving longitudinally, replacing a convergent-divergent nozzle. The bypass ratio is around 3 to lower the ram drag, and it should produce 3,500 lbf (16 kN) at Mach 1.4 and FL500, with a cruise fuel consumption increased by 50% over the Mach 0.78 CFM56-5.
My necessaries are embark'd: farewell. Adieu! I have too grieved a heart to take a tedious leave.

Post Reply