Bad News for Boeing Starliner
- OFSO
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 19355
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
- Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
I read that the capsule can only be undocked from the ISS manually by someone inside it, with the port locked shut. I suppose they might wait long enough for the doors to fall off, which I understand is a failing of Boeing-built devices. At least any alien civilizations watching this farce from afar will realise we are no threat to them.
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
That sounds like a fundamental screw-up in design.
- OFSO
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 19355
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
- Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
It appears that the marooned astronauts will be flown back aboard Mr Musk's excellent spaceship next February, while NASA will fly Boeing's Starliner back unmanned in September this year. Should this prove a success Boeing will extend the philosophy to their GA Fleet, and it is to be expected that 737s and Dreamliners will also fly without crew and passengers in the future, thus aiming for a zero rate of incidents..
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
NASA finally gives Boeing Starliner capsule a return date. But it will fly home without its crew
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/29/science/ ... index.html
After 12 weeks in space, Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft is finally set to return home from the International Space Station on September 6 — albeit without its two-person crew.
The troubled spacecraft will undock from the orbiting laboratory around 6 p.m. ET, and it will spend about six hours maneuvering closer to home before landing around midnight in New Mexico’s White Sands Space Harbor.
The astronauts who rode aboard Starliner to the space station on June 5, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, will remain on board the orbiting laboratory.
NASA announced on August 24 that experts were wary of gas leaks and issues with the Starliner capsule’s propulsion system, leading the agency to determine the spacecraft is not safe enough to finish its mission with crew on board.
“The uncrewed Starliner spacecraft will perform a fully autonomous return with flight controllers at Starliner Mission Control in Houston and at Boeing Mission Control Center in Florida,” according to a NASA update posted Thursday. “Teams on the ground are able to remotely command the spacecraft if needed through the necessary maneuvers for a safe undocking, re-entry, and parachute-assisted landing in the southwest United States.”
How the Starliner vehicle performs during its return trip could be crucial to the future of the overall Boeing program.
If the spacecraft experiences a mishap or NASA ultimately decides not to certify the vehicle for human spaceflight — a step that would set up the vehicle to make routine trips to orbit — it would mark yet another blow to Boeing’s already damaged reputation.
Repeating this test flight and implementing redesigns on Starliner could cost the company millions of dollars — on top of the roughly $1.5 billion the company has already recorded in losses on the Starliner program.
“All of us really wanted to complete the (Boeing Starliner) test flight with crew, and I think unanimously we’re disappointed not to be able to do that,” Ken Bowersox, associate administrator for NASA’s Space Operations Mission Directorate, said last week. But “you don’t want that disappointment to weigh unhealthily in your decision.”
Even if Starliner’s uncrewed return trip goes well, NASA will still face a crucial decision on whether to grant the spacecraft its human spaceflight certification even though it did not complete its mission as intended.
Throughout the weeks that engineers on the ground worked to understand the thruster issues and leaks plaguing the Starliner, Boeing maintained that it believed the vehicle would be safe to bring astronauts Williams and Wilmore home.
In a statement on August 24, Boeing said that it “continues to focus, first and foremost, on the safety of the crew and spacecraft. We are executing the mission as determined by NASA, and we are preparing the spacecraft for a safe and successful uncrewed return.”
Williams and Wilmore will now fly home aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule no earlier than February. The Crew Dragon spacecraft has been certified to fly astronaut missions for about four years and has made about a dozen crewed trips to orbit.
PP
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/29/science/ ... index.html
After 12 weeks in space, Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft is finally set to return home from the International Space Station on September 6 — albeit without its two-person crew.
The troubled spacecraft will undock from the orbiting laboratory around 6 p.m. ET, and it will spend about six hours maneuvering closer to home before landing around midnight in New Mexico’s White Sands Space Harbor.
The astronauts who rode aboard Starliner to the space station on June 5, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, will remain on board the orbiting laboratory.
NASA announced on August 24 that experts were wary of gas leaks and issues with the Starliner capsule’s propulsion system, leading the agency to determine the spacecraft is not safe enough to finish its mission with crew on board.
“The uncrewed Starliner spacecraft will perform a fully autonomous return with flight controllers at Starliner Mission Control in Houston and at Boeing Mission Control Center in Florida,” according to a NASA update posted Thursday. “Teams on the ground are able to remotely command the spacecraft if needed through the necessary maneuvers for a safe undocking, re-entry, and parachute-assisted landing in the southwest United States.”
How the Starliner vehicle performs during its return trip could be crucial to the future of the overall Boeing program.
If the spacecraft experiences a mishap or NASA ultimately decides not to certify the vehicle for human spaceflight — a step that would set up the vehicle to make routine trips to orbit — it would mark yet another blow to Boeing’s already damaged reputation.
Repeating this test flight and implementing redesigns on Starliner could cost the company millions of dollars — on top of the roughly $1.5 billion the company has already recorded in losses on the Starliner program.
“All of us really wanted to complete the (Boeing Starliner) test flight with crew, and I think unanimously we’re disappointed not to be able to do that,” Ken Bowersox, associate administrator for NASA’s Space Operations Mission Directorate, said last week. But “you don’t want that disappointment to weigh unhealthily in your decision.”
Even if Starliner’s uncrewed return trip goes well, NASA will still face a crucial decision on whether to grant the spacecraft its human spaceflight certification even though it did not complete its mission as intended.
Throughout the weeks that engineers on the ground worked to understand the thruster issues and leaks plaguing the Starliner, Boeing maintained that it believed the vehicle would be safe to bring astronauts Williams and Wilmore home.
In a statement on August 24, Boeing said that it “continues to focus, first and foremost, on the safety of the crew and spacecraft. We are executing the mission as determined by NASA, and we are preparing the spacecraft for a safe and successful uncrewed return.”
Williams and Wilmore will now fly home aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule no earlier than February. The Crew Dragon spacecraft has been certified to fly astronaut missions for about four years and has made about a dozen crewed trips to orbit.
PP
- OFSO
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 19355
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
- Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
I read an article in the financial papers wondering whether Boeing has the "resources" i.e. money, to continue the project. The moon lander is also late and very over-budget.
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:47 am
- Location: The South Island, New Zealand
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
Guardian: Nasa astronaut reports ‘strange noise’ from Boeing Starliner spacecraftThe Nasa astronaut Butch Wilmore has reported a “strange noise” coming from the stricken Boeing Starliner space capsule whose problems have left him and his colleague Suni Williams stuck in orbit for six months longer than they anticipated when they blasted off from earth in June.
Wilmore radioed mission control in Houston on Saturday to report a pulsing sound from a speaker inside the capsule. “I’ve got a question about Starliner,” Wilmore said. “There’s a strange noise coming through the speaker … I don’t know what’s making it.”
That set off a hunt for the cause of the noise in the spacecraft that has been dogged with helium leaks and propulsion issues and is now set to return on autopilot to a landing point in New Mexico, without Wilmore and Williams, on 6 September after Nasa decided it was too risky for astronauts to fly in.
The pair are now slated to return to Earth in a capsule built by Boeing’s competitor SpaceX, in February. In order to get Wilmore and Williams down, two Nasa astronauts set to join the international space station will be left behind from a mission later this month.
The source of the pulsing noise coming from Boeing spacecraft is believed to have come from a speaker feedback loop between the space station and Starliner.
But during the search for the audio culprit, Wilmore asked Houston flight controllers to see if they could listen but ultimately Wilmore, apparently floating in Starliner, had to put his microphone up to the speaker.
“Alright Butch, that one came through,” mission control radioed Wilmore. “It was kind of like a pulsing noise, almost like a sonar ping.” Wilmore radioed back: “I’ll let y’all scratch your heads and see if you can figure out what’s going on … Call us if you figure it out.”
The strange ping was captured and shared by a Michigan-based meteorologist named Rob Dale and was first reported by Ars Technica. According to the outlet, audio oddities in spacecraft are not unusual. In 2003, the Chinese astronaut Yang Liwei said he heard what sounded like an iron bucket being struck by a wooden hammer.
"That Noise"
- OFSO
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 19355
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
- Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
Pictures on NASA Website of NASA and Boeing staff waiting to deal with the Starliner capsule post-landing. Lots of people. I would have thought plastic bags would have been the order of the day.
- OFSO
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 19355
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
- Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
Arrived back safely. Who'd have thought it. Well done.
- G~Man
- Capt
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: California on a fire or a sailboat somewhere.
- Gender:
- Age: 61
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
Good job Boeing, but second place---ya still lost.
Life may not be the party you hoped for, but while you're here, you may as well dance.
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
The good news is that those waiting for the StarLiner's arrival back had advance information that it was arriving empty.
Imagine their surprise had they not known and found the capsule empty.
PP
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
Equally full............
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
While there was no crew aboard the capsule was loaded with obsolete equipment from ISS as well as trash and probably some science experiments.
So not a total waste.
Also, since it landed intact, Boing will hopefully figure out how they screwed up the thrusters.
PP
So not a total waste.
Also, since it landed intact, Boing will hopefully figure out how they screwed up the thrusters.
PP
- OFSO
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 19355
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
- Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Bad News for Boeing Starliner
The thrusters that failed were, I believe, on the service unit which was jettisoned after leaving the ISS and which burned up on re-entry. But I'm sure they have a pretty good idea what failed and why.