The Tiltrotor

Post Reply
Message
Author
Cacophonix
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 8327
Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 10:14 pm
Location: Wandering

The Tiltrotor

#1 Post by Cacophonix » Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:28 am

In response to C16's very interesting post on this aircraft here, I have taken the liberty of setting up its own thread.

https://ops-normal.org/viewtopic.php?p=151286#p151286

To be fair to myself, I did watch C16's video of the AW609's test pilot but my concentration was broken by my better half, who in the spirit of decimating my bookshelf continually interrupted me, asking if this or that book could be thrown out (the answer to all of these questions being "no"), and I missed some of the more salient points in the video. I have watched it again in peace this morning but am still unconvinced of the AW609's ability to perform safely on one engine out in certain scenarios.

Let me posit one emergency situation that I can't get my head around. I do this by way of being a devil's advocate, and not being vexatious or tedious for the sake of it, as I want to learn and think about this craft, my knowledge of this aircraft type being basically nil.

Let's us say the aircraft is in flight, flying with the rotors tilted forward, flying pretty much as a normal fixed wing aircraft , when the critical engine (unless of course the tiltrotor has contra rotating props, which would make sense) or simply an engine goes bang and is mechanically destroyed, therefore being unable to rotate or not being able to be driven by the turbine and simply wind milling. One then assumes the connecting drive shaft from the good engine will shear, as it is designed to do, as in a twin helicopter for example, but now we will have the classical engine out scenario in a twin engined aircraft with the much greater length of the prop/rotor exacerbating the control issues encountered by the pilot. How is the pilot going to be able contol that situation with the enormous drag from the one stopped, or even worse, unfeathered, wind milling rotor as the mighty rotor on the other "wing" continues" to run yawing the aircraft massively, and very quickly, resulting in roll, resulting an a loss of control?


Caco

Cacophonix
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 8327
Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 10:14 pm
Location: Wandering

Re: The Tiltrotor

#2 Post by Cacophonix » Mon Oct 22, 2018 8:46 am

The AW609's one engine out handling appears to be very similar, but possibly superior, to that attributed to the V22 (Osprey).
The Osprey can fly on one engine like an airplane or even with the rotors angled upward somewhat, but only with the lightest possible load, under ideal conditions and at low altitude could a V-22 hover on one engine.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... -tiltrotor
The AgustaWestland AW609 civil tiltrotor passed another milestone on the road to certification by completing autorotation testing at AgustaWestland’s Arlington, Texas facility over the course of 10 flight hours in March and early April. Test aircraft Number 1 made more than 70 power-off conversions from airplane to helicopter mode. The Italian manufacturer said the tests covered the full windmilling and autorotation envelope and that “the performance of the aircraft exceeded expected characteristics seen during (flight) preparation in the engineering simulator.” The company characterized aircraft handling during autorotation as “benign.”

AgustaWestland completed flight envelope expansion trials for the 609 in December and is currently assembling its supply chain for the aircraft in preparation for serial production. The manufacturer is in the process of adding two more aircraft to the flight-test program for a total of four. Now in final assembly, the third test aircraft is slated to fly by year-end. The AW609 is being developed under the FAA’s new criteria for “powered lift” vehicles, which incorporate portions of the Part 29 helicopter rules. AgustaWestland expects to receive certification in 2017.
Autorotation Ability

The issue of whether autorotation testing was even necessary was a matter of some contention between the company and the FAA, according to AW609 test pilot Pietro Venanzi. Venanzi has been with the AW609 program since 2001 and has logged more than 550 hours in the two prototypes currently flying. Because of the 609’s interlinked and redundant engine, transmission and drive systems, the only situations that could conceivably create a dual engine failure and complete loss of power to the drive system would be fuel contamination or fuel exhaustion, said Venanzi. “It’s not like a conventional helicopter and [total power failure] is a huge improbability, less than 10 to the minus 12,” he said. “No Part 25 fixed-wing aircraft is required to demonstrate a deadstick landing because [the possibility] is so remote.”

“When you have a single engine failure in helicopter mode, or 75-percent nacelle, you stay in helicopter mode and come back and land or fly to the alternate. In airplane mode, you stay in airplane mode, zero-percent nacelle, and you keep going with the remaining engine. If both engines quit you remain in windmilling, gliding flight. When you select a landing site you convert to autorotation–95-percent nacelle–and take it down to the ground,” Venanzi said.

Emergency reconversion detents for 75 and 95 nacelle are located on the thumb wheel, which is also the aircraft’s power lever. Once the detents are entered they speed up the nacelle pitch change from the normal three degrees per second to eight degrees per second. Also, when both engines fail, software automatically returns the flap setting to zero, the optimum to preserve airflow to the rotors for autorotation.

There is a brief period of no airflow through the rotors during the transition from windmilling to autorotation that produces rpm droop into the mid-70 Nr region. However, Venanzi said that rpm must droop below 70 percent for the rotors to become unrecoverable. “There is no way the rotors are going to droop that low,” Venanzi said.

Nevertheless, “we have developed a technique of making small pitch changes between 60- and 75-percent nacelle” that minimizes droop into the mid-80s range, he said. From there, rpms rapidly recover to 95 to 100 percent, depending on center of gravity and weight. During testing, autorotations were performed from the 609’s mtow of 16,800 pounds down to 14,000 pounds throughout the full c.g. range. The flight control system automatically adjusts the aircraft to maintain 100-percent Nr during an autorotation, eliminating the need for pilots to adjust the collective pitch as they would in a traditional helicopter. “The flight control system is always trying to govern 100-percent Nr. That is something that comes in handy at the bottom of autorotation when flaring, when the Nr tends to go above 100 percent (in a conventional helicopter). The 609’s control system holds it at 100,” Venanzi said.

During flight-test, autorotations were initiated at 7,000 feet agl. Transitioning from windmilling to a steady, fully developed autorotation to safely make a landing spot requires approximately 3,000 feet of height, Venanzi said. The maximum sink rate was 3,500 feet per minute. Estimated forward speed at touchdown is 45 to 55 knots. AgustaWestland did not perform autorotations all the way to touchdown but arrested them at 3,000 feet agl, where a VSI reading of zero was observed for up to five seconds. In an actual autorotation, the flare would be initiated at 200 feet agl. The company did perform autorotations all the way to the ground in the 609 simulator and found that the actual aircraft behaved more benignly than the sim.

“It positively surprised us,” Venanzi said. “We have been able to do phenomenal flares up in the air. We won’t have any problem training people to do it.”

Venanzi emphasized that an autorotation is “the least likely thing to happen in this aircraft. However, the test results show how good the tiltrotor concept is. There was a lot of skepticism about this aircraft’s ability to autorotate, so it is good that we have done it.”

AgustaWestland is beginning flutter testing and finishing the software to enable one engine inoperative (OEI) training in the aircraft without having to shut down an engine (the OEI switch). Further flight-testing to validate performance with various payloads will also be on the agenda this year, but most of the flight-test heavy lifting has been accomplished.

“The program has made a lot of achievements,” Venanzi said.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... -tiltrotor

Very interesting and while this article doesn't answer all the questions it allow one to start to penetrate the mystery that is the tiltrotor.

Caco

Post Reply