B52s in RAF Fairford
- TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
And cowboy hats...
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 81
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Interesting relistening to that. The intercom chat before the missile explosion had greater similarity to the live Bomber chat from WW2 than modern Hollywood ideas of combat chat.
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Affectionately known as BUFFs (Big Ugly Fat Fellas or a similar word beginning with F) - these big beasts cost around $14million each.
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 81
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
I bet all the little pink bodies inside will be around the same cost.
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 81
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Interesting video of course 8 engines wasn't always enough :
1960, SAC developed procedures so that the B-52 could use the Hound Dog's J52 engine for additional thrust while the missile was located on the bomber's two pylons. This helped heavily laden B-52s fly away from their airbases faster, before enemy nuclear weapons obliterated them. The Hound Dog could then be refueled from the B-52's wing fuel tanks.[10]
I remember one report in Combat Crew of a copilot who left the Hound Dogs on full power for 4 or 5 hours. Thrusting on 10 engines!
1960, SAC developed procedures so that the B-52 could use the Hound Dog's J52 engine for additional thrust while the missile was located on the bomber's two pylons. This helped heavily laden B-52s fly away from their airbases faster, before enemy nuclear weapons obliterated them. The Hound Dog could then be refueled from the B-52's wing fuel tanks.[10]
I remember one report in Combat Crew of a copilot who left the Hound Dogs on full power for 4 or 5 hours. Thrusting on 10 engines!
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Sheesh, Elmer - I ain't never seen Mountain Wave like that! Lookee there boy - all 8 P&Ws throttled right back and still we're crusin'! Say - did we ever do that there 'after take-off checklist'?
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 81
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
BOAC, I think that was about the size of it. What was not recorded, or I would have remembered, was if it was an operational patrol or a pair of training rounds.
- TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
More on those B52's in action with the Norwegian Air Force.
https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/secur ... 52-bombers
https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/secur ... 52-bombers
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Nice pic. Love the reheat! The Fluffs must have been going some
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Apparently, a B52 is currently trying to land back after a Mediterranean sortie as one engine has 'failed'.
Talk of fuel-dumping - but why would a B52 returning from a mission with 'only' 7 operational engines need to dump fuel?
Talk of fuel-dumping - but why would a B52 returning from a mission with 'only' 7 operational engines need to dump fuel?
- Undried Plum
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 7308
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 8:45 pm
- Location: 56°N 4°W
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Mebbe 'cos the max landing weight has got nowt to do with the power available?
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Maybe the Mediterranean sortie was cut short? - but:-Undried Plum wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:00 pmMebbe 'cos the max landing weight has got nowt to do with the power available?
Maybe it's SOP to empty the tanks in case of fire?The B-52 made the distress signal after completing a mission over the Mediterranean Sea.
The aircraft's flight path shows it began heading towards the UK to land.
- Undried Plum
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 7308
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 8:45 pm
- Location: 56°N 4°W
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Their missions can be very very long, so yes, perhaps they still had a silly amount of fuel for a landing, even after a round trip from Fairford to the Med.
I'm still surprised that a 7-engined landing rates as much as a Pan. Mebbe there were other consequences of the engine failure? Uncontained turbine failure, perhaps? With secondary damage?
I'm still surprised that a 7-engined landing rates as much as a Pan. Mebbe there were other consequences of the engine failure? Uncontained turbine failure, perhaps? With secondary damage?
- Ex-Ascot
- Test Pilot
- Posts: 13146
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:16 am
- Location: Botswana but sometimes Greece
- Gender:
- Age: 68
Re: B52s in RAF Fairford
Or maybe just because they are American.Undried Plum wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:19 pmTheir missions can be very very long, so yes, perhaps they still had a silly amount of fuel for a landing, even after a round trip from Fairford to the Med.
I'm still surprised that a 7-engined landing rates as much as a Pan. Mebbe there were other consequences of the engine failure? Uncontained turbine failure, perhaps? With secondary damage?
'Yes, Madam, I am drunk, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly.' Sir Winston Churchill.