Strafing question
- Opsboi
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 2776
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:37 pm
- Location: Watching LHR D-09 E
- Gender:
Strafing question
Rather an interesting bit of whimsy in one of the other chatrooms I occasionally take a quick half in - main topic Welsh rugby, but that's by the by - I'd be interested to see if there's an answer
Q - "When watching war films with planes shooting at say a column of people on a road the bullets from the plane always look like they hit the ground about 10 to 15 feet apart.
But that's just for effect shirley?
Anyone calculate the spacing on the ground of these bullets if say the plane is flying at 240mph and the m/c gun fires at say 420 rounds per minute?"
A -"Machine guns are designed and built to be inherently inaccurate in order to give a "cone of fire" instead of all the rounds landing in the one spot. The "cone of fire" gets larger the longer the range you're firing at. So I don't think it's possible to work this one out."
The original questioner conceded that he should have added the word "theoretical" somewhere, and I suggested he also needs a theoretical altitude
Any ideas, aviators?
Q - "When watching war films with planes shooting at say a column of people on a road the bullets from the plane always look like they hit the ground about 10 to 15 feet apart.
But that's just for effect shirley?
Anyone calculate the spacing on the ground of these bullets if say the plane is flying at 240mph and the m/c gun fires at say 420 rounds per minute?"
A -"Machine guns are designed and built to be inherently inaccurate in order to give a "cone of fire" instead of all the rounds landing in the one spot. The "cone of fire" gets larger the longer the range you're firing at. So I don't think it's possible to work this one out."
The original questioner conceded that he should have added the word "theoretical" somewhere, and I suggested he also needs a theoretical altitude
Any ideas, aviators?
Re: Strafing question
Never thought about it! However, 240 mph =88 fps x4: 420 rounds per min =1/7 th of a second between rounds.
Thus between each round a/c has moved 4 * 88/7 ft. = 50 ft.
Thus between each round a/c has moved 4 * 88/7 ft. = 50 ft.
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 81
Re: Strafing question
(88*4)/(420/60)/n
Where n=number of guns.
Where n=number of guns.
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 2534
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 3:20 am
- Location: Back home, looking for a bad bottle of Red
- Gender:
- Age: 69
Re: Strafing question
Awfully slow firing MG at that rate.the m/c gun fires at say 420 rounds per minute?"
The Colt Browning 303 fitted to the Hurricane and Spitfire fighters had a cyclic rate of somewhere near 1200 rounds per minute.
From memory, even the .50BMG fitted to the American a/c had a faster rate of fire.
You only live twice. Once when you're born. Once when you've looked death in the face.
- izod tester
- Capt
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:27 pm
- Location: Forest of Dean
- Gender:
- Age: 76
Re: Strafing question
Canon fire and not machine guns, but the attached shows the fall of canon fire during an attack by Mosquitoes on a ship:
https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... hotographs
https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... hotographs
- Opsboi
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 2776
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:37 pm
- Location: Watching LHR D-09 E
- Gender:
Re: Strafing question
Thank you, all!
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 2549
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:05 am
- Location: Planet Claire
- Gender:
- Age: 63
Re: Strafing question
A Vulcan 20mm fires 100 times a second in its first second.
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 81
Re: Strafing question
So typically 100 rounds over 800 feet.
- boing
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 2715
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:32 am
- Location: Beautful Oregon USA
- Gender:
- Age: 77
Re: Strafing question
I'm not sure what you folks are getting at here.
With a modern gunsight that compensates for so many variables if the pilot could hold accurately on the target for a one second burst all of the rounds will go into the same small hole, there will be no dispersion. That's what sights are for. But, if he holds on to the target too long, target fixation, he will end up in the same hole as the projectiles. So, eventually he pulls out of the dive which will, if he has any ammunition left, cause the impacts to track along the ground.
.
With a modern gunsight that compensates for so many variables if the pilot could hold accurately on the target for a one second burst all of the rounds will go into the same small hole, there will be no dispersion. That's what sights are for. But, if he holds on to the target too long, target fixation, he will end up in the same hole as the projectiles. So, eventually he pulls out of the dive which will, if he has any ammunition left, cause the impacts to track along the ground.
.
the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible.
Re: Strafing question
I understand to OP referred to one of the 'strafing' films along a column of people, not 'target shooting' to which you refer.
- TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: Strafing question
If you are going to do a bit of strafing, then you might as well be in one of these...
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
- TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: Strafing question
There is some amazing genuine WW2 strafing footage online...
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 81
Re: Strafing question
WW2 was essentially a black and white war so seeing it in colour is slightly surreal. Not only that, the pastoral scenes appear so peaceful in contrast to the film of bomb explosions and incendiary fires.
- ian16th
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 10029
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
- Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
- Gender:
- Age: 87
Re: Strafing question
Thanks to Agfa, there are more colour film archives from the German side that from the British.Pontius Navigator wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 11:33 amWW2 was essentially a black and white war so seeing it in colour is slightly surreal. Not only that, the pastoral scenes appear so peaceful in contrast to the film of bomb explosions and incendiary fires.
Of course after Pearl Harbour, when Hollywood took an interest, there are plenty of 'Merican records.
Cynicism improves with age
- boing
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 2715
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:32 am
- Location: Beautful Oregon USA
- Gender:
- Age: 77
Re: Strafing question
If you look carefully the films show exactly what I am talking about. There are what you could call "point" targets and "area" targets. Point targets would be railway engines, trucks or individual parked aircraft, for those you make a straight approach to be able to use the sights accurately and all of the rounds fired go into a relatively small area before you break off the attack. Area targets would be troop concentrations or dispersed targets such as a line of railway carriages on a length of track. These you would attack by choosing the best target first then adjusting the point of aim so that the rounds "walk" along the ground covering a larger area.
The technique used depends on the target and the munitions you are firing. For example, with the larger caliber cannons used against armoured targets and ships you do not have enough ammunition to waste it on dispersed targets, you must use aimed fire to be effective. If you are loaded with plenty of 0.303 rounds you can afford to spread them around and they will be effective against personnel and soft vehicles.
Wikipedia has quite a good basic explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strafing
.
The technique used depends on the target and the munitions you are firing. For example, with the larger caliber cannons used against armoured targets and ships you do not have enough ammunition to waste it on dispersed targets, you must use aimed fire to be effective. If you are loaded with plenty of 0.303 rounds you can afford to spread them around and they will be effective against personnel and soft vehicles.
Wikipedia has quite a good basic explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strafing
.
the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible.