Why Martha? Why?

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
TheGreenGoblin
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17597
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1

Why Martha? Why?

#1 Post by TheGreenGoblin » Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:19 pm

Feisty lady.... but what a silly move as she clearly has more flying left in her... :)

https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/bri ... evocation/
A well-known Ohio pilot and aviation columnist may be the first to run afoul of a new regulation triggered by the ADS-B mandate enacted in 2020. Martha Lunken, 78, who pens a popular column in Flying Magazine and is a fixture in Midwest aviation, flew under a bridge near her home airport, which bears her name, in southern Ohio in March of 2020, an impulsive and “immature” stunt she told AVweb she knew was wrong. But she said a coincidental malfunction of her Cessna 180’s transponder with ADS-B-Out may have resulted in her being slapped with an emergency revocation of all her certificates instead of the suspension that normally accompanies such transgressions.


Lunken said that after she’d crossed flying under a bridge from her bucket list she headed home and checked in with Cincinnati Approach and was told her transponder was off. She said she reset it and set a new code and it resumed working. In their subsequent investigation, FAA officials said that she’d shut it off on purpose to stop the system from tracking her while she threw caution to the wind. Lunken, a longtime former FAA safety inspector and veteran flight instructor, vehemently denies the charge. “I know what I did in that cockpit and I did not turn it off,” she said.

The agency used a new section of its Legal Enforcement Actions guidebook for FAA staff, which calls for revocation of a certificate for “operating an aircraft without activated transponder or ADS-B Out transmission (except as provided in 14 C.F.R. § 91.225(f)) for purposes of evading detection.” The section was added in a package of other amendments in January of 2020, just after ADS-B became mandatory in most controlled airspace and about two months before Lunken’s flight of fancy. The section is on page 9-14 at the bottom.

Lunken said she took the 180 to her avionics tech, who said the transponder seemed to be loose in its mount when he took it out. It tested fine on the bench and after it was re-installed. The FAA interviewed the tech. Lunken said the tech was unable to tell them whether the device was malfunctioning during the flight. She said now it’s her word against the FAA’s on whether the intermittent ADS-B Out signal was a malfunction or a deliberate violation. She said radar tracks that were part of the evidence against her showed the ADS-B signal from her aircraft to be intermittent. She speculates she jarred the connections loose during a few bone-jarring landings in gusty crosswinds. “I had made several rather brutal landings at OH77 (the 32’ wide, concrete, crosswind strip just north of the bridge) and it was bumpy at low levels,” she said. “I did not turn it off.”

Lunken, who has spent 60 years flying in that area, said that if she was trying to prevent Big Brother from watching her do something, there are myriad easier and virtually undetectable ways to do it. The FAA declined comment and suggested AVweb submit a Freedom of Information Act request to review the agency’s evidence supporting their findings. A spokesman said that’s agency policy on legal matters.

As for the stunt itself, which has been the focus of most of the social media attention and reaction, Lunken said it was just a silly spur-of-the-moment thing. “I looked over my left shoulder and I saw the bridge and I thought ‘I just have to fly under that bridge before I get old.’” The Jeremiah Morrow Bridge is 239 feet above the Little Miami River Gorge and Lunken said she didn’t have to draw very heavily on her 14,000 hours of experience to get to the other side. “It certainly didn’t take any skill,” she said. As for it being a reflection of her attitude toward safety and the regs, she said nothing could be further from the truth. “It is not part of a pattern of behavior and I am not an irresponsible pilot,” she said. “I would never have put anyone in danger.”

A security camera snapped a picture of her passage and the FAA sent her a letter a few weeks later saying they were investigating. She said she expected to be sanctioned, thinking she might have to sit out for a period of weeks or months. FAA enforcement guidelines call for a period of suspension of 30 days to four months for the bridge stunt, which is a violation of altitude and distance-from-objects regs. “I knew it was illegal and I did it anyway,” she said. “I’m 78 and I’m still not very mature and I hope I never am.” When she didn’t hear anything after six months, she thought the FAA had dropped the matter. The emergency revocation letter was delivered March 19.

Lunken said she’s considered appealing the revocation but her lawyers estimated the cost at $25,000. Instead, she’s spending her time watching from the ground while others fly and hitting the books to reclaim her private pilot certificate. Revocation cancels all certificates and ratings (she was an ATP) and she has to start over to get back in the air. So far, it’s been an eye-opener as she studies for the written. “A lot has changed in 60 years,” she said. Normally, a revocation prevents the guilty party from taking flight training for a year but her legal team negotiated a three-month reduction. “I’ll be a student pilot in December.”

Lunken will also be on hiatus from Flying for an unspecified period of time but will write a column in the August issue explaining the incident. She said she has kept her editors informed of all developments in her case, which Flying officials confirmed.
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."

PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4997
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 67

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#2 Post by PHXPhlyer » Thu Apr 29, 2021 9:12 pm

I would read her articles if someone left a copy of the mag on the flight deck.
She had some good articles but... :-o #-o

PP

AtomKraft
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:05 am
Location: Planet Claire
Gender:
Age: 61

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#3 Post by AtomKraft » Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:56 am

Good for her.
Flying has become a bit too bland these days....if a bit safer. Pilots too.

TheGreenAnger
Snr FO
Snr FO
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Oudtshoorn

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#4 Post by TheGreenAnger » Sun Jul 31, 2022 7:37 am

Happily she has now got her licence back.


https://www.flyingmag.com/martha-lunken ... ngs-again/
They told me that I knew **** nothing, and I told them that I knew **** all - with apologies to David Niven.

PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4997
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 67

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#5 Post by PHXPhlyer » Sun Jul 31, 2022 3:00 pm

Flying Magazine is now a quarterly? :-o

PP

TheGreenAnger
Snr FO
Snr FO
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Oudtshoorn

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#6 Post by TheGreenAnger » Sun Jul 31, 2022 4:04 pm

PHXPhlyer wrote:
Sun Jul 31, 2022 3:00 pm
Flying Magazine is now a quarterly? :-o

PP
Old Gordon Baxter would roll in his grave.

I received my copy here in the UK last week. I haven't the heart to unsubscribe.
They told me that I knew **** nothing, and I told them that I knew **** all - with apologies to David Niven.

User avatar
Ex-Ascot
Test Pilot
Test Pilot
Posts: 11396
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:16 am
Location: Botswana but sometimes Greece
Gender:
Age: 66

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#7 Post by Ex-Ascot » Mon Aug 01, 2022 12:26 pm

Ray Hanna,

'Yes, Madam, I am drunk, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly.' Sir Winston Churchill.

TheGreenAnger
Snr FO
Snr FO
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:40 pm
Location: Oudtshoorn

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#8 Post by TheGreenAnger » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:48 pm

Wonderful video Ex-Ascot. RIP both Hanna's!

Funny thing, if you are asked to do this or ask permission you tend not to have to field official flack later as, Martha and this chap found out to their cost!





Truth is I have a huge amount of respect for all three of them, even the rebels!
They told me that I knew **** nothing, and I told them that I knew **** all - with apologies to David Niven.

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 15151
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#9 Post by Boac » Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:25 pm

Martha and this chap found out to their cost!
I confess to total ignorance - who is Martha?

PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4997
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 67

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#10 Post by PHXPhlyer » Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:27 pm

Post #1!

PP

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 15151
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#11 Post by Boac » Mon Aug 01, 2022 7:32 pm

Thanks - I'd misplaced my white stick. :))

PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4997
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 67

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#12 Post by PHXPhlyer » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:14 pm

What about your dog?

PP

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 15151
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#13 Post by Boac » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:20 pm

Another dog had run off with his stick.

PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4997
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 67

Re: Why Martha? Why?

#14 Post by PHXPhlyer » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:30 pm

Ah...The blind leading the blind. =))

PP

Post Reply