Missiles.

Message
Author
AtomKraft
Capt
Capt
Posts: 1019
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:05 am
Location:

Re: Missiles.

#21 Post by AtomKraft » Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:55 am

He's not gone far.....

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 6761
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: Missiles.

#22 Post by Boac » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:01 am

I know that. :))

User avatar
TheGreenGoblin
Capt
Capt
Posts: 1653
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
Location: Turkey

Re: Missiles.

#23 Post by TheGreenGoblin » Thu Feb 13, 2020 5:43 am

AtomKraft wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:51 pm
Project Pluto.

What has been learned, cannot easily be unlearned. The Russkis are romoured to be trying this, or a variant of, again.

Perhaps underwater???
Project Pluto was an endeavour that was marked by madness, perversity and moments of sheer technical genius that was curtailed by the Pentagon because, even, they realised that this project went one step beyond.
It’s hard to know exactly what happened on August 8, when an accident offshore of the Nenoksa Missile Test Site in northern Russia caused an explosion. But we do know that it left five Russian nuclear scientists dead and caused a spike in radiation levels in the surrounding area. The available evidence has led some US intelligence officials, arms control experts, and President Trump to conclude that the Russians were testing an engine for a nuclear-powered cruise missile (though there are skeptics).

If the suspicions are correct, then this accident (and prior setbacks) show that the Russian quest for a nuclear-powered cruise missile may be a quixotic one. Before pressing on, Vladimir Putin would be well-advised to review some of the myriad problems that the United States’ own nuclear-powered cruise missile program, Project Pluto, experienced in the late-1950s and early-1960s. Below is a brief overview of the technical, environmental, and political challenges that Project Pluto faced.
Project Pluto and the trouble with Russia’s nuclear-powered cruise missile - NB: note the link to the Osti paper therein.

Reverting to Pluto, it is hard to know what US citizens would have thought of low level tests of a cruise missile emitting a highly radioactive plume while producing a hypersonic boom that would have damaged walls, smashed windows and burst eardrums in up to a 20 mile cone behind the missile at about Mach 3.5! What the USA thought its allies might have thought of such a missile being released over their territory in the case of its actual use is a moot one.

The extraordinary thing is that under the auspices of the Lawrence Radiation Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Labs and the US Atomic Energy and a small consortium of aviation (and other - see below) companies, a nuclear powered ram-jet was constructed and even run at full throttle for a few minutes.

Project Pluto

The design of the engine code named Tory was an interesting one, utilising a novel ceramic core with fuel elements manufactured by

CoorsTek (a company related to the Coors bad beer buggers).
"En 'n vrou sal jy dood maak in 'n donker kamer met 'n hael geweer"

Post Reply