GG, you are not doing very well on research either.
This article is interesting but rather lengthy so I leave most of the reading to you. Here is an extract:
https://fort-russ.com/2020/06/covid19-p ... aningless/
This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction.
But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”
So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.
Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.
The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.
How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
Now, Doctor Mullis received a Nobel Prize for his work on PCR, is that enough for you or would you prefer beatification in addition?
The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.
There it is. Instead of using a scalpel for our operation we are using a kitchen spoon. By its very principal of operation PCR interferes with the integrity of the sample being tested which makes it sensitive to operator technique as well as providing false positives based on disease artifacts rather than active disease itself.
But then, Dr. Mullis and the Nobel Prize committee were probably stupid, or is it the people that decided an inappropriate test, grabbed in an emergency, should decide the fate of nations were the stupid ones?
.
.
the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible.