Coronabollocks..

A place to discuss politics and things related to Govts
Message
Author
User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4881
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: Safe and Effective For Professional Pilots?

#6081 Post by barkingmad » Sat Jan 21, 2023 10:12 pm

Ooooh dear yet again, this does not look good, but heyho, who am I to question the official line on the Vak Scenes?
As previously mentioned by me elsewhere in this forum but as usual, ignored as "conspiracy theory" or the ramblings of the resident nutter, this aspect of the 'plague' precautions has so far cleverly been swept under the carpet of discarded face nappies and other plandemic detritus but alas no more;

"The FAA broke it's own recommended best practice/rules by allowing - forcing - pilots to take the shot. From their own website, Pharmaceuticals (Therapeutic Medications)

Do Not Issue - Do Not Fly, directed at Aviation Medical Examiners (AME's): "For any medication, the AME should ascertain for what condition the medication is being used, how long, frequency, and any side effects of the medication. The safety impact of the underlying condition should also be considered...FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved less than 12 months ago. The FAA generally requires at least one-year of post-marketing experience with a new drug before consideration for aeromedical certification purposes. This observation period allows time for uncommon, but aeromedically significant, adverse effects to manifest themselves..."

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/he ... m/dni_dnf/"

If that's not enough for the narrative slaves here in this supposedly professional-aviation forum, here's a better explanation from one of the better monitors of official garbage out there in the big wide world of "the science";

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the- ... email=true

Nothing to see here, move along, there's a good chap/chappess..... :-w

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 15908
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6082 Post by Boac » Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:31 am

So, recently, (post Covid), a raised level of heart damage (mainly myocarditis) has been noted in pilots. Why is not known as far as I am aware.

To be considered - from the British Heart Foundation:

"A study led by researchers at the BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre at the University of Glasgow, published in May 2022, found that 1 in 8 people who were hospitalised with Covid-19 were later diagnosed with myocarditis. The study also showed that in addition to heart inflammation, severe Covid can cause inflammation across the body and damage to the kidneys.

The research, which followed 159 people who were hospitalised between May 2020 and March 2021, found that the risk of myocarditis was much higher in those who were severely ill (needing a ventilator or treatment in intensive care).

Almost all of the patients involved in this study were unvaccinated, which means they were already at a higher risk of severe illness from Covid-19. This research was carried out before the Omicron variant was detected in the UK, and we know that generally people who catch this variant experience milder symptoms."

I read this to say there is no definitive proof that the vaccine worsens the occurrence of myocarditis but that Covid itself can cause it? It is all part of the 'risk/benefit' analysis sensible people make. Note the high incidence in unvaccinated people.

It will be very interesting to see how the 'DNI' directive and the detail

"FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved less than 12 months ago.
The FAA generally requires at least one-year of post-marketing experience with a new drug before consideration for aeromedical certification purposes. This observation period allows time for uncommon, but aeromedically significant, adverse effects to manifest themselves. Contact either your Regional Flight Surgeon or AMCD for guidance on specific applicants or to request consideration for a particular medication."

will apply to the 'Emergency use authorisation' for vaccines. I assume the '12 months' has expired, or will there be a mass of failed FAA medicals as new Covid variant vaccines appears? What is the CAA position?

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4881
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: Safe and Effective...Maybe....

#6083 Post by barkingmad » Sun Jan 22, 2023 6:07 pm

The stench of male cattle manure continues to pervade the nostrils, even if they're blocked by a knobswab! :))

Now they're fighting over who to blame as the reckoning draws closer;

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/01/19/bla ... -minister/

"MHRA then saw adverse event reporting starting to reveal serious safety issues in the U.K. and around the world. First, myocarditis and blood clots, in March 2021, a few weeks* after approval of the AstraZeneca vaccine (now effectively withdrawn) and later other heart issues, neurological problems and immunosuppression with Pfizer and Moderna".

But of course as we all know, the MHRA is squeaky-clean, above board and not subject to ANY influence by the folks whom it is supposed to be "regulating";

"Freedom of Information request on whether the MHRA receives funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (FOI 21-624)
We do receive funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as other sources outside government such as WHO. This funding mainly supports work to strengthen regulatory systems in other countries.
The majority of our income comes from the pharmaceutical industry through fees.
The current level of grant funding received from the Gates Foundation amounts to approximately $3m. This covers a number of projects and the funding is spread across 3-4 financial years".

Below is the full helping of manure and I trust it will count towards 'evidence' for some of our more stubborn sceptical members?

https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... foi-21-624

But isn't it a massive relief to know that the decision was taken by a guvvment Minister, and not one of those dreadfully corrupt folks in white coats, some of them even sporting stethoscopes?! :-o

* F A O UK CAA, you were aware of this of course, weren't you, that's why you allowed aircrew to be FORCED to take an untrialled drug? ! ? X(

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 15908
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6084 Post by Boac » Sun Jan 22, 2023 7:46 pm

"MHRA then saw adverse event reporting starting to reveal serious safety issues in the U.K. and around the world. First, myocarditis and blood clots, in March 2021, a few weeks* after approval of the AstraZeneca vaccine (now effectively withdrawn) and later other heart issues, neurological problems and immunosuppression with Pfizer and Moderna".
You overlook, I think, that reporting of adverse effects of vaccination could only start when vaccination began?
But for the Covid vaccines, MHRA is saying that the Secretary of State personally took all the decisions.
This makes the need for a proper enquiry even greater.

Any theories on what could have caused the reported "1 in 8" myocarditis events in the largely unvaccinated people? What are the figures for the ratio now-a-days, post vaccination?

User avatar
OFSO
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 16369
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Whitton
Gender:
Age: 79

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6085 Post by OFSO » Tue Jan 24, 2023 6:37 pm


flyboy22
CPL
CPL
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:22 am
Location: United Kingdom
Gender:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6086 Post by flyboy22 » Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:56 pm

It’s rather late and hence this is a short post but with a link to what in fact describes what has been going on and as requested by someone, names of the perpetrators.

I’ve no doubt there will be those here, who want written evidence to be produced before they will believe what they hear and see in the video. Perhaps if you write to some of those people in the video, they may take the time to provide you with said paperwork evidence. But for me, I’m quite happy with the way they’re hopefully taking things, and maybe in the not too distant future we will see the criminals brought to justice. Using their their very own ‘paperwork trail’ against them.

Please listen and watch the video, it is around 17min in length. And please perhaps consider carefully the information that is revealed, before volunteering for any medical procedures, that you most likely do not need.


flyboy22
CPL
CPL
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:22 am
Location: United Kingdom
Gender:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6087 Post by flyboy22 » Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:52 am

And another….


prospector
Capt
Capt
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:37 am
Location: New Zealand
Gender:
Age: 82

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6088 Post by prospector » Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:54 am

There would appear to be many highly qualified medical people who have been claiming the dangers of these so called vaccines for many months.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... avir-cola/

"Story at a glance:

So far, all of the drugs developed against COVID-19 have been disastrous in one way or another. Remdesivir, which to this day is the primary COVID drug approved for use in U.S. hospitals, routinely causes severe organ damage and, often, death.
Despite that, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved remdesivir for in-hospital and outpatient use in children as young as 1 month old.
Another COVID drug, Paxlovid, will in some cases cause the infection to rebound when the medication is withdrawn.
Molnupiravir (sold under the brand name Lagevrio) also has serious safety concerns. Not only might it contribute to cancer and birth defects, it may also supercharge the rate at which the virus mutates inside the patient, resulting in newer and more resistant variants.
The fact that U.S. health authorities have focused on these drugs to the exclusion of all others, including older drugs with high rates of effectiveness and superior safety profiles, sends a very disturbing message. They’ve basically become extensions of the drug industry, protecting the drug industry’s interests at the cost of public health."

User avatar
admin2
Capt
Capt
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:13 pm
Location:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6089 Post by admin2 » Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:19 am

FB22 - thank you for providing some names and the way you have done so. I echo your view
maybe in the not too distant future we will see the criminals brought to justice.
(except I would prefer 'possible criminals'). At what stage is this proposed action against them? If you can keep us updated with current progress that would be good for all of us. Establishing any time point from the videos is difficult since they do refer to 2017 in places. Certainly the suggestion that the 'Wuhan' virus was planned is alarming (particularly around the 9 min mark in video 1.) This whole issue is one that needs to be either proven or put to bed.

The figures quoted for the effects of Remdesivir are concerning. I also remember Dr John Campbell's coverage in his videos of his (unsuccessful) 2020 attempts to have full clinical trials on Ivermectin in the UK, and I did contact the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care at the time in support of trials. Again, unsuccessfully.

flyboy22
CPL
CPL
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:22 am
Location: United Kingdom
Gender:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6090 Post by flyboy22 » Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:15 pm

Thank you ‘Admin2’, and others, who took the time to try and contact their MPs or Secretary of State for Health. I did the same to my MP (twice) and never got a reply.

And yes I agree ‘possible criminals’ or ‘alleged criminals’, would be the ‘correct’ term to use for these dangerous parasites.

I will continue researching for and listening to the many people who are striving for justice to be carried out against the perpetrators of these crimes. Crimes that have been committed against all of us, under the guise of a ‘pandemic’.

And I think the evidence is clear and proven, from the video (No 1), and others, that the ‘Wuhan virus’ was ‘gain of function’ and planned. Sen. Rand Paul has accused Fauci (with copies of Fauci’s emails in his hand) in Senate Hearings, of exactly that on more than one occasion. That evidence just needs to be aired in an unbiased court.

User avatar
admin2
Capt
Capt
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:13 pm
Location:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6091 Post by admin2 » Wed Jan 25, 2023 1:28 pm

flyboy wrote:And I think the evidence is clear and proven, from the video (No 1), and others, that the ‘Wuhan virus’ was ‘gain of function’ and planned.
It appears so, but I do not accept 'clear and proven', though I would wish it were tested. All 'evidence' available to us is only 'hearsay' on video.
That evidence just needs to be aired in an unbiased court.
That I do accept.

It should be remember that Dr Martin has a company ('M-CAM') which makes a lot of money out of patent investigation and other stuff. I am concerned that there has been no progress I can find on investigation of this matter. Even Rand Paul appears to have gone 'silent' since June last year.

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4881
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6092 Post by barkingmad » Wed Jan 25, 2023 6:11 pm

Admin2 sez:---"thank you for providing some names and the way you have done so. I echo your view..."

Well, since you seem obsessed with names, here's a few (more) to consider;

-Mukesh D. Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Industries
· Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees WEF
· Mark Carney, UN Special Envoy for Climate Action
· Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Canada
· Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the IMF
· Queen Rania of Jordan
· David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, Carlyle Group
· Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, WEF
· Marc Benioff, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Salesforce
· Thomas Buberl, CEO, AXA
· Laurence Fink, Chairman & CEO, BlackRock
· Orit Gadiesh, Chairman, Bain & Company
· Fabiola Gianotti, Director General, CERN
· L. Rafael Reif, President of MIT
· Mark Schneider, CEO, Nestlé
· Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Defense Minister, Singapore
· Robert Mercer, Renaissance Fund
· Larry Page, Google
· Al Gore, Environmentalist
· Angel Gurría, Secretary General OECD
· Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information Communication Technology, Rwanda
· Yo-Yo Ma, Cellist
· Luis Alberto Moreno, WEF
· Jim Hagemann Snabe, Chairman of Siemens and of Maersk
· Feike Sijbesma, Philco
· Zhu Min, Deputy Managing Director, IMF
· Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook/Meta
· Bill Gates, Microsoft
· Herman Gref, CEO, Sberbank
· André Hoffmann, Vice-Chairman Hoffman-La Roche
· Christine Lagarde, President, European Central Bank
· Peter Maurer, President, Red Cross
· Patrice Motsepe, Chairman, African Rainbow Minerals
· Julie Sweet, CEO, Accenture
· Heizo Takenaka, Economist
· Dustin Moskovitz, Open Philanthropy

And what is your problem with Dr David E Martin, who has been tracking this theatre de la merde since 1999 and part of his companie's activities was to monitor practices and breaches of bioweapons contracts.

Neil Ferguson escapes scrutiny here but I pray he'll be amongst the last into the tumbrils.

William Gates Esq does not seem to feature here, but he gets entire videos to himself which might interest some here... :-?

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4881
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: Safe and Effective The History.

#6093 Post by barkingmad » Wed Jan 25, 2023 6:36 pm

But do we ever learn from history?

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/coron ... ine-166116

Apparently not, even in so-called First World countries let alone Africa and India.

Edited to add: - - - Another example of US medical practice;

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/histo ... egee-study

And the scale of the current Phase 3 trials of the so-called Covid "vaccine" puts this lack of BLM into the shade!

User avatar
admin2
Capt
Capt
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:13 pm
Location:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6094 Post by admin2 » Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:14 pm

BM - an interesting list of names. What are you saying they have done? Committed some crime? If you recall the request was to name those accused of 'genocide' and 'murder'. Are you responding to
So - name the 'evil killers' hinted at in the Martin video.
If that is your claim, there could well be problems with your post unless you can substantiate the accusations. Is it?

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 15908
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6095 Post by Boac » Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:21 pm

BM - regarding the Corona Virus vaccines, I did ask you
Any theories on what could have caused the reported "1 in 8" myocarditis events in the largely unvaccinated people? What are the figures for the ratio now-a-days, post vaccination?
Can you answer that question?

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 4881
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6096 Post by barkingmad » Thu Jan 26, 2023 10:03 am

Boac wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:21 pm
BM - regarding the Corona Virus vaccines, I did ask you
Any theories on what could have caused the reported "1 in 8" myocarditis events in the largely unvaccinated people? What are the figures for the ratio now-a-days, post vaccination?
Can you answer that question?
Yes.

One problem with the (mainly) US figures is their stipulation that one is NOT classified as “vaccinated” until 14 days or more after the ‘stab’.

So it’s quite acceptable in that dystopian world for a ‘stab’ victim to drop dead or become seriously adversely affected, within hours or even minutes of the needle insertion, but of course they have not been “vaccinated”.

You knew that already, didn’t you, so why ask the question?

And if you were unaware of that statistical ‘fudge’, then you have not been keeping up to speed with the scam.

Therefore with such crackpot criteria being employed to supposedly track AEs, it is impossible to maintain accurate records of who died from what, how very convenient for the perpetrators?! :-?

As you are sooh fond of asking questions, I present a rather difficult exam for you and the other Covidiots here to complete to the best of your abilities, extra paper is available and take as long as is needed;

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/100- ... -to-answer

Caution: Answers which involve the use of any form of ‘modelling’ will result in marks being deducted. =))

Candidates are also permitted to refer to “Incriminating Evidence” enclosure in the question paper for assistance if so required!

My own question is: With the rapid rollout and complete absence of medium to long term “vaccine” side-effects trials never completed and with a “state of emergency” no longer current, what happened to the ‘Precautionary Principle’, a precaution for which you chided me way back in those golden days of lockdowns, masks, anti-social distancing and all the other pantomime garbage which has conveniently been forgotten? :-w

User avatar
admin2
Capt
Capt
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:13 pm
Location:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6097 Post by admin2 » Thu Jan 26, 2023 10:58 am

Can you answer that question?

Yes.
No. I see no figures to support.

In any case I'm tired of your relentless rabid posting on this topic and total negativity on just about anything else. The number of members actively replying to your posts here is very small - 4 maybe 5 at most.

Now then - in the process of taking over I discussed several things with Alison. She informed me that she was seriously considering deleting the membership of those who only post in Politics and Controversial Topics (that would, of course, include you). I have not done that (as you will personally have noticed).

However, due to the incessant barrage of negativity you produce I am blocking you from posting in that forum for 2 weeks, effective 26/1/23. You are free to post (if you can?) anything constructive in any other forum, but be warned should you try to sneak in something which should be in Politics and Controversial Topics you will be further restricted. I do not think the site will be adversely affected for the 2 weeks.

flyboy22
CPL
CPL
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:22 am
Location: United Kingdom
Gender:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6098 Post by flyboy22 » Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:06 pm

Hi Admin2....I may be accused of being too generous or naïve here, but I think that BM (who's been banned) is perhaps trying to do something here to help save people's lives. It would seem that he believes, from the wealth of data and evidence given by eminently qualified physicians, lawyers and researchers, that people could be at risk of dying or being maimed from these so-called 'vaccines'. I see that attempt to help save lives, as a good cause.

In fact, I have the same wish to help others. Thankfully, some people I have spoken with and shown the data to, have themselves gone on to carry out their own research using their own contacts and methods, and have arrived at the same conclusion. They are also seriously worried about the 'vaccines' and what they are doing to people who have taken them. Plus the long-term affects are obviously as yet totally unknown.

And this is for a 'vaccine' that 'the elite' want everyone to take. For a virus which clearly does not greatly affect the young and/or the healthy. The question "Why" should be asked. And at the highest level. But it is not being asked. Why not?

In fact, I've looked at the questions in the link that BM posted. And to be honest, all of these questions should be answered. Should they not? And they should be answered whilst there is a halt in the 'vaccine' program. There are enough doctors, virologists, pathologists, undertakers and other specialists trying to get them stopped. Which in itself should clearly cause 'those in power' to think there might be something wrong, and that there should be a halt whilst a thorough investigation is carried out, and those questions answered once and for all. And it should be publicly done.

All MSM channels should be used to let the public know the answers to the questions. Why do the MSM only preach the 'narrative'? Why do they 'silence' anyone who begins speaking in opposition to the 'narrative'. These are obvious questions which should be answered before any more arms (especially those of children) are jabbed with this stuff. How can anyone disagree with that suggestion.

I hope Admin2, that this posting is taken in the way it's meant. I.e. with people's lives in mind. Those colleagues on here who I may have even sat next to at one time or another. Or had a beer with 'down route' at one time or another. Oh...those were the days!

I can only write about what I have seen and heard during the last 3 years. And I can honestly state that I have seen enough and heard enough from reputable, honest, caring people, to be very concerned about what is happening with regard to these 'vaccines'. And that is how I write here. With the simple wish to help others see and hear the same. And for them to then make their own decisions about what is best for them and their families.

I cannot (with any integrity) remain 'silent', as this would demonstrate a complicity with the 'narrative'. A 'narrative' that many good people are fighting against, and being vilified for doing so.

User avatar
admin2
Capt
Capt
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:13 pm
Location:

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6099 Post by admin2 » Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:29 pm

I cannot (with any integrity) remain 'silent
You have not been so requested.

User avatar
OFSO
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 16369
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Whitton
Gender:
Age: 79

Re: Coronabollocks..

#6100 Post by OFSO » Thu Jan 26, 2023 4:20 pm

Extraordinary statement: that there are an elite who want us to take vaccines. Who are they? Why should they?

Post Reply