How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

A place to discuss politics and things related to Govts
Message
Author
User avatar
OFSO
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 18601
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
Gender:
Age: 80

How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#1 Post by OFSO » Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:54 pm

How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

Mayor of London ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Birmingham ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Leeds ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Blackburn ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Sheffield ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Oxford ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Luton ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Oldham ... MUSLIM
Mayor of Rochdale ... MUSLIM

Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques
Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts
Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils
Muslims-Only No-Go Areas Across The UK

Muslim Women ... 78% don't work and are on FREE benefits/housing
Muslim Men ... 63% don't work and are on FREE benefits/housing
Muslim Families ... 6-8 children planning to go on FREE benefits/housing and now all UK schools are ONLY serving HALAL MEAT!

All this achieved by just 4 million Muslims out of the 66 million population!


..... and we can't decide on an immigration policy???

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17209
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#2 Post by Boac » Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:03 pm

Any reference for those alarming figures?

BackToAllNightLights
Capt
Capt
Posts: 1245
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:19 pm
Location: just passing thru on my way to
Gender:

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#3 Post by BackToAllNightLights » Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:37 pm

Yes, source please .
History does Not repeat itself through time. It does however, sometimes rhyme.

Sisemen

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#4 Post by Sisemen » Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:49 pm

Jeezuz feckin Christ :-o

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17209
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#5 Post by Boac » Sat Aug 26, 2017 6:53 pm

Frightening as the post is, it needs to be tempered with its source (the only one I have found) an unlikely '
Maine Republic Email Alert'. It may well be true but we need a little more basis!

https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/201 ... ver-of-uk/

It is popping up in various blogs too
http://www.northstandchat.com/showthrea ... m-invasion
and
https://ballmemes.com/i/muslim-mayor-of ... r-15029935

Two Google has found

OFSO? Your call.

User avatar
OFSO
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 18601
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
Gender:
Age: 80

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#6 Post by OFSO » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:07 pm

A usually reliable source - but I'm prepared to be proven wrong.

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17209
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#7 Post by Boac » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:12 pm

It may well be true, but we must avoid 'Trumping' on this topic! If true it is indeed frightening.

User avatar
Fox3WheresMyBanana
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 12987
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Location: Great White North
Gender:
Age: 61

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#8 Post by Fox3WheresMyBanana » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:35 pm

I believe the list of mayors is correct.
The number of mosques, according to the bbc in 2014, was around 1,750. It was 1,500 in 2011. One would expect the number to be around 2,000 now. I would imagine the 3,000+ includes prayer rooms.
The halal meat story is rubbish. Some schools quietly switched around 2012-2015. After they were caught doing it, those exposed now state they offer non-halal meat for those who wish it. For many schools, nobody knows, as records are not held centrally (not unreasonably), so FoI requests for overall stats get nowhere. Individual parents are free to ask at their own schools. There have been several schools which have taken pork off the menu, despite having muslim minorities, not majorities. I cannot find any updates on those.
The data on muslim benefits claimants may possibly be correct in terms of state support, though I suspect this includes muslims on state pensions who paid in during their working lives, and is therefore misleading. Since those are probably on minimum pensions, it is likely they are also receiving some form of partial assistance with rent/council tax, as are native Britons on that income level. It would be wrong to class this as free housing.
The 6-8 children is, from memory, roughly double the correct figure, although the correct figure is roughly double that of native Britons.
I can check the rest over the next couple of days if others can't find them.

However, to a certain extent these are not the worst stats. For example, an ICM poll found that 36% of 18-24 year old muslims in Britain thought that apostates should be executed, and two thirds of all muslims said they would NOT report a friend they suspected of involvement in terrorist plotting.. So much for integration with "British values". Two Gallup polls have found similar results, and the situation is worse with the younger muslims, and is getting worse with time, not better.

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17209
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#9 Post by Boac » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:44 pm

Thanks, F3.

The 'Mayor' thing is simply indicative of a deeper issue, that the voting majority of residents favours a Muslim to be elected. Therein lies the problem.

User avatar
Fox3WheresMyBanana
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 12987
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Location: Great White North
Gender:
Age: 61

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#10 Post by Fox3WheresMyBanana » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:54 pm

Well, you could also take a look at Labour Party shenanigans, in that they don't get a lot of choice.
https://order-order.com/2017/08/25/labo ... eselected/

and then there's Tower Hamlets...

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17209
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#11 Post by Boac » Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:00 pm

I did like Guido's warning there:
"Don't be a bore, stay on topic, if you want to impersonate a 1970s cab driver sod off to Breitbart or Mail Online."

I'll be off then................... :))

User avatar
Fox3WheresMyBanana
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 12987
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Location: Great White North
Gender:
Age: 61

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#12 Post by Fox3WheresMyBanana » Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:00 am

My brother is a current Black Cab driver.
Let's just say things haven't changed much since the 1970s in the Cab world ;)
He 'ad that Bob Geldof in the back of the Cab not so long ago. Swearin' like anyfing 'e was, as ever. Fair tip, mind.
As for wot fings are coming too...Dagenham East* mate.
To the best of my knowledge, my brother follows neither Breitbart nor the Daily Mail.

* four stops beyond Barking (on the Central line).

Capetonian

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#13 Post by Capetonian » Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:29 am

Regardless of the accuracy of the figures quoted, and bear in mind anyway that some of the true numbers are unknowns, it is clear that these aliens have taken over some areas and town centres and irreversibly changed the face of such places.

Whether that is bad is another discussion, but it is undeniable fact.

Of course there will always be those who will deny the facts or choose to ignore them, as there are people who still think the earth is flat.

Slasher

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#14 Post by Slasher » Sun Aug 27, 2017 1:08 pm

The Islamic Republic of Britain will be a reality in my lifetime. I thought it was 50-50 given the power of Labour ratbags but I'm sure of it now.

I was just wondering what the payoff will be to the socialist parties?

OFSO a mate of mine in London confirms your first post.

User avatar
Fox3WheresMyBanana
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 12987
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Location: Great White North
Gender:
Age: 61

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#15 Post by Fox3WheresMyBanana » Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:23 pm

Labour are socialists, and so want no borders. Muslims want the whole world to be muslim, so no borders. Globalists want no borders to make maximum profits. All three have a primary common interest at present. There's no conspiracy as such, but each are working to the same end and therefore happy to support others who will help them do that.
Heck of a bunfight between them coming once they've achieved that, however.
All three would be seriously disadvantaged by the removal of government financial support, and this is why effectively every nation is now running a deficit it has no intention of ever eliminating, and every election has to be bought by promising more government spending. The globalists still want government money, usually in the form of hidden subsidies or competitive advantage brought about by government regulations, but they don't want corporate taxes increased to pay for it. So, the burden falls on the typical taxpayer.
However, in the UK at least, income tax take has been flat for several years - which is one reason why the government-promised elimination of the deficit that was promised 5 years ago (for five years time) is now 8+ years away.
Only question is - when does the money run out? Or, to be exact, when does the continual 'printing' of new QE money cease to have any effect? Don't know.

The worst thing that could happen for all three of the groups would be a legally mandated balanced budget.

User avatar
OFSO
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 18601
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
Gender:
Age: 80

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#16 Post by OFSO » Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:33 pm

A limited number of people I know, but two Muslims of my acquaintance are in both categories - they have a job and claim benefits. Not limited to Muslims of course.

Slasher

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#17 Post by Slasher » Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:24 pm

A noble but lost cause IMO.

[bbvideo=560,315]https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=fA6XcyXsxXU[/bbvideo]

User avatar
Ibbie
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 6077
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 9:11 pm
Location: Mijas Costa, Malaga, Spain
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#18 Post by Ibbie » Wed Oct 25, 2017 11:35 am

Challenge to non-stunned meat served in Lancashire schools

September 22nd, 2017

The leader of Lancashire County Council Geoff Driver has submitted a proposal to ban halal meat that has not been pre-stunned before slaughter from being served in the county’s schools, after it has been revealed that twenty-seven schools with a total of 12,000 pupils across the county are serving all pupils meat from suppliers where stunning is not used. The Council will vote on the proposal on 26 October. Humanists UK, which opposes religious exemptions in law that allow animals to be slaughtered without stunning, welcomes this proposal. It stressed that all public bodies including schools have a duty to ensure that the meals they provide conform to legal requirements, which clearly prohibit non-stunned meat being consumed on the general market.

Non-stunned slaughter involves the cutting of an animal’s throat whilst the animal is still fully conscious and alert. Current regulations regarding the welfare of animals specify that all animals must be stunned so that they are insensible to pain at the time of slaughter, reducing the animal’s suffering. However, there are loopholes in this law that allow Muslims and Jews to slaughter meat in accordance with halal and kosher traditions without stunning, for consumption only by members of their respective religions.

There is substantial evidence that non-stunned halal meat is being served widely and unknowingly to non-Muslims including in schools, hospitals, and prisons. The Halal Food Authority believes that halal meat (of which 20 percent is not stunned before slaughter) now represents 25 percent of the entire meat market in the UK. Currently, there is no requirement for non-stunned halal meat to be labelled indicating the method of slaughter.

Humanists UK Director of Public Affairs Richy Thompson commented, ‘We are pleased that Lancashire County Council is taking on board the concerns of parents and pupils who believe that religious slaughter without stunning is cruel, unacceptable, and would not wish for themselves or their children to be served these meat products unknowingly. Humanists UK, alongside the RSPCA, the British Veterinary Association, and the Humane Slaughter Association, have called for the end of these legal loopholes that allow halal and kosher suppliers to disregard the welfare of animals at slaughter. At the least consumers should be aware the meat has been produced in this way through the introduction of a clear labelling system and public bodies should recognise their legal duties with regard to the food they provide to the general public.’

AtomKraft
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 2549
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:05 am
Location: Planet Claire
Gender:
Age: 63

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#19 Post by AtomKraft » Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:37 pm

If we in the UK, have decided that something should be done in a certain way- and in this case it's the slaughter of animals for food- then that is how it should be done here.

I'm no expert but it seems to me that stunning animals before killing them is more humane than the Halal method.

We should not be changing our ways to accommodate immigrants.

Capetonian

Re: How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

#20 Post by Capetonian » Wed Oct 25, 2017 3:22 pm

I would suggest that for those Moslems who do not wish to adapt to the way of life of the countries they've chosen to live in, we suggest that they start by sacrificing a family member, or maybe more than one, by slaughtering them without being stunned or sedated first.

Post Reply