om15 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 1:00 pm
I suspect that we ain't seen nothing yet.
We will have the gushing baby period, followed by affairs, trial separations, bride fleeing back to the US, high profile divorce, the additional publicity from a no holds barred US press will be interesting, with all the royal family secrets being blasted out 24/7 for the interested citizens of Arkansas.
With all the privileged benefits, wealth and pampered lifestyle they only have to behave properly to ensure the Royal Family remains dignified, but they can't do that, why on earth they failed to catch the warning signs of Fergie, Diana and now this latest bird goodness knows.
The Queen must be wringing her hands with it all, when she isn't tearing up driving licences that is.
I would refer you to page 8 of the current "Private Eye " and the piece entitled "People's Punchbag " for clarity here.
Both the Mail and it's sister rag, the M.o.S are aware of their respective readers demographic and hence such stories are clearly intended to induce the mandatory appalled indignation....also helps with the circulation figures.....and lets be honest, Meghan is a refreshing change from the usual born and (in) bred gene pool from whence aspiring free loaders, c/o the tax payer, are selected.
But as I say, if yourself and others can force yourselves to part with a mere £2 here in the UK.. .(overseas readers dependent on their currency of choice and exchange rate ) plus identifying the issue in question....1489, they too may realise both rags have embarked on one of their virtuous crusades.