Ops-Normal.org

Is there a procedure for sacking a Duke?

There's a procedure for cutting off their heads.

Boac wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 13, 2021 10:43 am

There's a procedure for cutting off their heads.

I think that HMQ was practicing when she cut her cake with a sword at the G7 summit.

Oh goodness me. This is going to be dynamite.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... tatue.html

And leave baby Lilibut behind? IIRC baby A was a reason she didn't visit with Harry the last time.

Pontius Navigator wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:53 am

And leave baby Lilibut behind? IIRC baby A was a reason she didn't visit with Harry the last time.

Guess she's not breast feeding then.

It would be nice to think that she really does want to support Harry and let family see Archie. However the cynic in me thinks that it offers a good upstaging opportunity.

Mrs Ex-Ascot wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:18 am

Pontius Navigator wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:53 am

And leave baby Lilibut behind? IIRC baby A was a reason she didn't visit with Harry the last time.

Guess she's not breast feeding then.

It would be nice to think that she really does want to support Harry and let family see Archie. However the cynic in me thinks that it offers a good upstaging opportunity.

+1

+2

Upstaging opportunity if news is true and she also won't want him talking to Granny or Daddy on his own. Maybe she realises that there is a cold wind blowing their way from the U.K. and there may well, finally, be a possibility of being cut off completely. No royal connection, titles etc at all. Please, please!!

If this visit happens be prepared for a great display of ham acting.

I do not think that he/they will be allowed to talk to anyone alone. There will be another senior member of The Firm there to witness what is actually said instead of the fairytale they tell back home.

Now we know the reason for their animosity towards the Royal Family. It says that they are surprised. We are certainly not. Their offspring will not be Prince and Princess and they knew before the big fat NR interview.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... costs.html

Charles is correct, brutally correct.
For whatever reason, Diana was pumping other men.
Harry is the product of one of her lovers and her, so Harry is no son of his.
Little Archie is also not his grandson, and without a blood tie, it's hard to see how he could be a prince.

It's time that those interested in these things stopped dancing around the issue.

I'm not surprised Harry is in the huff, but he should look on the bright side. If it wasn't for his mum humping around, he wouldn't even be here!

That Wail photo is very good!

Anne and Edward's children are not Princes and Princesses. As Harry, Andrew was second in line after Charles so he was a Prince to his cousins Princesses. Their offspring are not made Prince or Princess so neither should Harry's.

Dry your eyes princess.

Plum.
Well, at least they have the same mum.

Proof positive that female infidelity tends to have worse consequences than the other sort...

Harry, is the bastard prince.

In more than one sense

Interesting 'news item' popped up on MSN news https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/p ... np1taskbar

It cannot be found on the IBT website????

Another lie at the chat show: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -show.html

Also this is a classic:

Meghan and Harry 'did not want to use Earl of Dumbarton title for Archie because it contained the word 'dumb'

Well, given his parents, he probably will be.

Good job Harry doesn't hold the title 'Duke of Scunthorpe'.

They don't seem to mind being the The Duke and Duchess of SusSEX