Is WHO fit for purpose?

[barkingmad]

“WHO Pandemic Treaty Will Give it Power to Declare Pandemics, Lockdowns and Vaccine Mandates With Force of Law, Leading Experts Tell MPs”;

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/23/who ... -tell-mps/

Whilst everyone has been sweating over the fate of Titan and it’s crew or looking eastwards towards the shenanigans in Russia, our old friend Tedros continues with his takeover of the World, the only ‘shots’ having been fired being those into the upper arm by (rarely aspirated) syringes.

Have any O-N members challenged their formerly democratically elected representatives with this prospect and if so, what was the response?

I await the reply from my “Red Wall” chappie, but I suspect he’s polishing his CV in anticipation of a career change!

[barkingmad]

Whilst all this lying and deception was happening, the World Harm Organisation was asleep at the helm, or were they also complicit due to vested interests?

“This is... “the biggest scientific scandal of our lifetime”, involving a deliberate attempt to suppress debate on a health catastrophe that killed almost 15 million people in two years. It revolves around a landmark commentary in Nature Medicine stating firmly that the five authors “do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible”. This was published in March 2020 – barely six weeks after the stumbling World Health Organisation had declared an international emergency.”

The full article is here and anyone who has been tracking this disaster will recognise the usual cast of villains who hopefully will be charged and will appear in the dock;

https://unherd.com/2023/07/the-secret-m ... -cover-up/

Just remember this is the same WHO who are trying to grab ultimate power over the former Western “democracies” when it comes to declaring the next inevitable PHEIC* or ‘fake’ as it is otherwise known.

Public Health Emergency of International Concern

[John Hill]

The full article is here ......

Yes, including such as

This is, one prominent US biologist told me, “the biggest scientific scandal of our lifetime”, involving a deliberate attempt to suppress debate on a health catastrophe that killed almost 15 million people in two years. It revolves around a landmark commentary in Nature Medicine stating firmly that the five authors “do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible”.

Hearsay anyone?

[barkingmad]

And your point is, apart from distracting from the article...?

Maybe this might just clarify the issue of censorship and suppression, typical of the WHO, WEF, UN, CDC, NIH, FDA et al;

:---"Now, hundreds of private messages between four of these five scientists, exchanged as they wrote and published this article, have emerged — and they are astonishing. The “super secret” discussions show this arrogant quartet boasting about success, misleading the media, sneering at journalists and making fun of other experts, even a world-renowned epidemiologist co-opted as the fifth author. They condemn China “for trying to rewrite what happened” and disclose Beijing sequenced the genome for SARS-CoV-2 — the virus that causes Covid — just before the rest of the world discovered from a Taiwanese tip-off that the disease had erupted in Wuhan.

Most significantly, these discussions on Slack expose the quartet’s deep fears that Sars-CoV-2 could have been tied to laboratory research — along with overt signs of pressure from “higher ups” to squash such suggestions. Clearly these scientists were concerned the disease was engineered. They dismiss the well-worn theory about the virus arising in a Wuhan animal market on several occasions, one calling it a “red herring”. Yet they abruptly switched direction in public despite the lack of discernible new evidence. They carried on debating their suspicions in private after the article’s publication — even as they attacked claims about a possible lab leak in public and their statement was used to condemn such “conspiracy theories”---:.

Can we assume from your post that you are still firmly wedded to the "narrative" and cannot bear to see anything which challenges that particular holy bible?

"Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood let alone believed by the masses".

And more food for thought for those who can't stand folks like me who question the official truth;

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/dissent

[John Hill]

And your point is, apart from distracting from the article...?

The point is that the entire post loses creditability.

[barkingmad]

More on "The Science" and the brilliant folks who preach it and profit from it.

Does this help you J H?



If not, then I give up and leave you to defend whatever it is you're defending...

[John Hill]

If not, then I give up and leave you to defend whatever it is you're defending...

Oh! So now we have a stealth strawman!

[barkingmad]

Tedros the Terrorist, how appropriate is that?!

Obviously we're paying enough attention to him so now the threats begin, and remember if you will the Event 201 simulation which became hard reality which we will all hopefully never forget;

"Here are Tedros the Terrorist and his committee’s demands:

All countries should update their National covid-19 programmes using the WHO strategic preparedness and response plan.
All countries should sustain collaborative surveillance for covid-19.
All countries should report covid-19 data to WHO or in open sources, especially on death and severe disease genetic sequences and data on vaccine effectiveness. (Open sources. Is it just a coincidence that Data Commons, hosted by Google, collects data from open sources into one worldwide database? This would prove useful not only for censorship but also for collecting data that countries are not voluntarily submitting to WHO.)
All countries should continue to offer covid-19 vaccination. (And so. perpetuate the genocide.)
All countries should continue to initiate support and collaborate on research to generate evidence for covid-19 prevention and control.
All countries should deliver optimal clinical care for covid-19 including access to proven treatments and measures to protect health workers and caregivers. (They ignored and demonised proven treatments, instead opting for harmful and lethal treatments and advocating for proven to be ineffective non-pharmaceutical interventions the first time around. Is WHO calling for the same again?)
All countries should continue to work towards ensuring equitable access to “safe, effective and quality assured” vaccines, tests and treatments for covid-19. (It takes a special kind of character to be able to lie in the face of overwhelming and irrefutable evidence of the proven to be harmful “vaccines.” For the word “equitable,” we can guess it means “they are targeting the people in the poorer countries” this time around. The African nations, for example, should be at least equally subjected to the genocidal vaccines, if not more so to catch up with Western nations so they are equally affected.)"

""The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."

The full article is here if you want the source and some more juicy tidbits;

https://expose-news.com/2023/08/14/gove ... terrorist/

Perhaps it's time those of us living in western 'democracies' alerted our elected representatives they've recently emulated turkeys voting for Christmas if they've allowed this bunch of dangerous charlatans to complete their power grab...