Made in China.
Re: Made in China.
Don't forget, the mask will be bugged.
- TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: Made in China.
FP = Feather Plan?barkingmad wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:52 am“UK CAA to award a Display Authorisation for a 2,000 drone formation?”
They regularly do so for starling murmurations, though no squawk is allocated to the formation, nor any FP submitted.
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Re: Made in China.
Drone drone drone drone....................
- Undried Plum
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 7308
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 8:45 pm
- Location: 56°N 4°W
- barkingmad
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
- Location: Another Planet
- Gender:
- Age: 75
Re: Made in China.
Poor old China, nobody here is interested in them since the price of bat & pangolin soup became unaffordable.
But things are drifting towards big economic stresses so who is holding whom by the short & curlys?
The ancient bonds pre-1938 look very pretty but 'twill be interesting to see if they ever get paid up?
But things are drifting towards big economic stresses so who is holding whom by the short & curlys?
The ancient bonds pre-1938 look very pretty but 'twill be interesting to see if they ever get paid up?
- barkingmad
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
- Location: Another Planet
- Gender:
- Age: 75
Re: Made in China.
Lest we forget, in the pan(dem)ic to get a needle stuck in us;
We have not heard very much from our politicians recently about China, apart from the ongoing row with Oz because they persisted in calling out the CCP for their role in starting and allowing this thing to proliferate.
We have not heard very much from our politicians recently about China, apart from the ongoing row with Oz because they persisted in calling out the CCP for their role in starting and allowing this thing to proliferate.
Re: Made in China.
Scott ('Scotty from marketing') was very clumsy, very clumsy indeed, but he's out of his depth and thats ok, most Australian PMs are.....but why there isn't a coordinated Western response? .... that is a real question ... and I think it may be because they all know they can't do without China....something about eggs all in the one basket??
Re: Made in China.
It is odd that the amount of people who die daily (US) either from the virus itself, or the virus complicating pre existing conditions (splitting hairs), the number is now far far far greater than the 11th of September 2001, there is not far greater outrage / coverage / critical thinking.
Instead another death toll of 9/11 proportions happens daily, and the dialogue is about who is or who is not wearing masks....
Goofy (?) to use an American term (?)
Instead another death toll of 9/11 proportions happens daily, and the dialogue is about who is or who is not wearing masks....
Goofy (?) to use an American term (?)
- barkingmad
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
- Location: Another Planet
- Gender:
- Age: 75
Re: Broken by China.
The FBI, and other security services around the world, will by now be in receipt of an open letter requesting an expedited investigation be opened into the role of the Chinese Community Party in promoting catastrophic public health policies across the West, i.e. lockdowns. The letter was written by a number of people, some of whom will be familiar to readers of Lockdown Sceptics.
Here as a taster are the final 2 paragraphs from the letter;
“Throughout 2020, lockdown measures have been quite popular, but that popularity is deceptive. For the general public, the idea that anyone might accept some outside incentive to support such devastating policies while knowing them to be ineffective, needlessly bankrupting millions of families and depriving millions of children of education and food, is, quite simply, too dark. Thus, the public supports lockdowns because the alternative, that they might have been implemented without good cause, is a possibility too evil for most to contemplate. But those who know history know that others with superficially excellent credentials have done even worse for even less.
Furthermore, most of the public believes that if there were anything untoward about the science behind lockdowns, intelligence agencies would stop them. For obvious reasons, those who work at intelligence agencies do not have the luxury of such complacency. Given the gravity of the decisions being made, we cannot ignore the possibility that the entire science of COVID-19 lockdowns has been a fraud of unprecedented proportion, deliberately promulgated by the Chinese Communist Party and its collaborators to impoverish the nations who implemented it”.
A fraud eagerly gobbled up by unfortunates like BoJo & Circus, driven by Prof Pantsdown whose support for the CCP method of pan(dem)ic handling is well documented elsewhere.
For those intelligent sentient human beans on O-N who really do give a toss about the damage being inflicted, the link to the full letter is appended;
https://ccpgloballockdownfraud.medium.c ... c2b#_ftn29
Be advised, it’s a lengthy document but the progress bar on the r h s of the page hits the beginning of the references section about halfwaydown one’s screen page and is the territory which will provide great satisfaction to our resident librarian who gets excited by references and links ad nauseam!
Here as a taster are the final 2 paragraphs from the letter;
“Throughout 2020, lockdown measures have been quite popular, but that popularity is deceptive. For the general public, the idea that anyone might accept some outside incentive to support such devastating policies while knowing them to be ineffective, needlessly bankrupting millions of families and depriving millions of children of education and food, is, quite simply, too dark. Thus, the public supports lockdowns because the alternative, that they might have been implemented without good cause, is a possibility too evil for most to contemplate. But those who know history know that others with superficially excellent credentials have done even worse for even less.
Furthermore, most of the public believes that if there were anything untoward about the science behind lockdowns, intelligence agencies would stop them. For obvious reasons, those who work at intelligence agencies do not have the luxury of such complacency. Given the gravity of the decisions being made, we cannot ignore the possibility that the entire science of COVID-19 lockdowns has been a fraud of unprecedented proportion, deliberately promulgated by the Chinese Communist Party and its collaborators to impoverish the nations who implemented it”.
A fraud eagerly gobbled up by unfortunates like BoJo & Circus, driven by Prof Pantsdown whose support for the CCP method of pan(dem)ic handling is well documented elsewhere.
For those intelligent sentient human beans on O-N who really do give a toss about the damage being inflicted, the link to the full letter is appended;
https://ccpgloballockdownfraud.medium.c ... c2b#_ftn29
Be advised, it’s a lengthy document but the progress bar on the r h s of the page hits the beginning of the references section about halfwaydown one’s screen page and is the territory which will provide great satisfaction to our resident librarian who gets excited by references and links ad nauseam!
- TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: Made in China.
I assume that it was the Chinese who underpinned the lockdowns that have occurred in plagues from time immemorial? Read your Journal of the Plague Year and embrace your inner Defoe before you defy common sense.
Keep taking the pills the bm.
Keep taking the pills the bm.
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
- Location: Gravity be the clue
- Gender:
- Age: 80
Re: Made in China.
EA, now just short of all WW2 military deaths
- barkingmad
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
- Location: Another Planet
- Gender:
- Age: 75
Re: Made in China.
O M G! It's that name again, come to haunt us all and stop life as we know it. What a shame he has not yet been charged with high treason and been permanently disabled?
"2. The Most Influential Institution for Covid-19 Models, Self-Described as “China’s Best Academic Partner in the West,” Has Been by Far the Most Alarmist and Inaccurate Covid-19 Modeler
In February 2020, a team from Imperial College London led by physicist Neil Ferguson ran a computer model that played an outsized role in justifying lockdowns in most countries. Imperial College forecast a number of potential outcomes, including that,-1by October 2020, more than 500,000 people in Great Britain and 2.2 million people in the U.S. would die as a result of COVID9, and recommended months of strict social distancing measures to prevent this outcome.[28] The model also predicted the United States could incur up to one million deaths even with “enhanced social distancing” guidelines, including “shielding the elderly.”[29] In reality, by the end of October, according to the CDC and the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS), approximately 230,000 deaths[30] in the United States and 37,000 deaths[31] in the United Kingdom had been attributed to COVID-19 (though deaths from all other leading causes — including heart disease, cancer, and influenza — mysteriously declined,[32] indicating that even these low counts from the CDC and NHS are vastly overstated).
A study by researchers at UCLA and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) compared the accuracy of various institutions’ models predicting COVID-19 mortality.[33] Across all time periods, the models produced by Imperial College were measured to have far higher rates of error than the others — always erring on the side of being too high".
4,400,000 cattle slaughtered in 2000 courtesy of Prof Pantsdown who said- "we estimate the 95% confidence interval for future vCJD mortality to be 50 to 50,000 human deaths considering exposure to bovine BSE alone, with the upper bound increasing to 150,000 once we include exposure from the worst-case ovine BSE scenario examined".
To date (2019),178 people in the UK have died from Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), the human form of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE).
How many of us will be sacrificed as "collateral damage"?
Are we chasing the rainbow of total and utter safety and at what cost? This quote is from the review of the CJD outbreak back then and perhaps 'guvvments' should be asking themselves the same question now;
"A feature of the later stages of the BSE/vCJD crisis has been Government's willingness to spend very large sums of money to avert a small number of fatalities, perhaps under the belief that this is what the public wants. But politicians need to realise that absolute safety is rarely if ever an achievable goal in a hazardous world. Instead they need to accept the concept of finite but acceptable risk and be prepared to shoulder the task of explaining this to the electorate".
"2. The Most Influential Institution for Covid-19 Models, Self-Described as “China’s Best Academic Partner in the West,” Has Been by Far the Most Alarmist and Inaccurate Covid-19 Modeler
In February 2020, a team from Imperial College London led by physicist Neil Ferguson ran a computer model that played an outsized role in justifying lockdowns in most countries. Imperial College forecast a number of potential outcomes, including that,-1by October 2020, more than 500,000 people in Great Britain and 2.2 million people in the U.S. would die as a result of COVID9, and recommended months of strict social distancing measures to prevent this outcome.[28] The model also predicted the United States could incur up to one million deaths even with “enhanced social distancing” guidelines, including “shielding the elderly.”[29] In reality, by the end of October, according to the CDC and the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS), approximately 230,000 deaths[30] in the United States and 37,000 deaths[31] in the United Kingdom had been attributed to COVID-19 (though deaths from all other leading causes — including heart disease, cancer, and influenza — mysteriously declined,[32] indicating that even these low counts from the CDC and NHS are vastly overstated).
A study by researchers at UCLA and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) compared the accuracy of various institutions’ models predicting COVID-19 mortality.[33] Across all time periods, the models produced by Imperial College were measured to have far higher rates of error than the others — always erring on the side of being too high".
4,400,000 cattle slaughtered in 2000 courtesy of Prof Pantsdown who said- "we estimate the 95% confidence interval for future vCJD mortality to be 50 to 50,000 human deaths considering exposure to bovine BSE alone, with the upper bound increasing to 150,000 once we include exposure from the worst-case ovine BSE scenario examined".
To date (2019),178 people in the UK have died from Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), the human form of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE).
How many of us will be sacrificed as "collateral damage"?
Are we chasing the rainbow of total and utter safety and at what cost? This quote is from the review of the CJD outbreak back then and perhaps 'guvvments' should be asking themselves the same question now;
"A feature of the later stages of the BSE/vCJD crisis has been Government's willingness to spend very large sums of money to avert a small number of fatalities, perhaps under the belief that this is what the public wants. But politicians need to realise that absolute safety is rarely if ever an achievable goal in a hazardous world. Instead they need to accept the concept of finite but acceptable risk and be prepared to shoulder the task of explaining this to the electorate".
Re: Made in China.
You are a deeply troubled soul. Little wonder you are bed wetting. I feel sorry for you.
- TheGreenGoblin
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 17596
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
- Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1
Re: Made in China.
Increase bm's dose of Clozapine says Doctor Krollspell...
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
-
- Chief Pilot
- Posts: 2549
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:05 am
- Location: Planet Claire
- Gender:
- Age: 63
Re: Made in China.
Well, here's some word from those who agree with me.
Have nothing to do with these fuggers, and buy not their stuff!
Have nothing to do with these fuggers, and buy not their stuff!