Yup that generalisation is basically true... As you imply, it was a misunderstanding of the internal dynamic of that market by the West that simply made things worse and actually bolstered the trade.John Hill wrote: ↑Sat Aug 14, 2021 6:05 amFarmers are paid in advance for their crop by 'agents' of parties in countries such as Tk'stan, Uz'stan and Tj'stan. They must grow the crop and deliver the harvest to pay the debt.
So if the well meaning foreigners come and destroy the crop things get very serious for the farmer who is left with a debt he can never pay.
Somewhat of a generalisation but there you go.
As it was, the aim of erradicating the opium trade was a post hoc rationalisation for an intervention that was failing and that had no rational basis in the first place. As ever the over simplification of the conflict into good guys versus bad guys was going to lead to some supendous strategic blunders. That is not to say that the Taliban are "nice guys!". They are not!