ET crash ADD NBO

Message
Author
Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17252
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#441 Post by Boac » Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:47 pm

OK, Wod, but it is an important distinction. If the THS only maintained 'attitude' the a/c would descend when it slowed down and would not maintain 1g.

User avatar
Ibbie
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 6077
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 9:11 pm
Location: Mijas Costa, Malaga, Spain
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#442 Post by Ibbie » Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:09 pm

I see TUI (UK) have leased in 3 x A321 from Olympus Airways, end of April to mid July as some cover for their grounded 737 Max.

User avatar
Wodrick
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 8373
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:23 am
Location: Torrox Campo, Andalucia.
Gender:
Age: 74

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#443 Post by Wodrick » Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:38 pm

I've just spent an age looking at schematics to determine what does the doing in "sidestick" mode. Still not clear :)
https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/ITORRO10?cm_ven=localwx_pwsdash

User avatar
Undried Plum
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 7308
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 8:45 pm
Location: 56°N 4°W

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#444 Post by Undried Plum » Thu Apr 18, 2019 6:10 pm

I see TUI (UK) have leased in 3 x A321 from Olympus Airways

Are you sure they're not just rebranded 737s, as per Chump's suggestion?




Image


Some great additional features

Like, f'rinstance: side-stick controllers; computers that will implement the pilot's attitudinal command in a reasonable manner unless the stickmonkey is a total ****; computers that instantly vote a **** computer out of office without waiting four years to do so. That sort of thing.

What would the new model be called? Boeing 321 sounds catchy.

The Lockheed all-flying rudder/fin could be used to replace the infamous 737 killer rudder; and could be rebranded ShakinThatAss™.

They could redesign the nose/cockpit so that it doesn't look like a recycled 707. No, don't call it a Comet, ferfuxake.

Don't call it a Cabriolet either. Hawaii tried that and it wasn't a good look.

They could rebrand it 'Trump' of course, but for most of the non-American English-speaking world 'Trump' is slang for fart. Surely nobody in their right mind would brand a brand-new brand as 'Fart'. Would they?

User avatar
boing
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 2714
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:32 am
Location: Beautful Oregon USA
Gender:
Age: 77

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#445 Post by boing » Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:18 pm

It seems to me that this problem would not have occurred if Boeing had simply lengthened the 737 gear legs to accommodate the new engines. Of course, this would have altered the wing design and possibly required re-certification.

There is a precedent for this aircraft layout, it was called the 757. Why not play games with certification of a 757 type rather than further stretch the 737 concept? Since the 757 fuselage is basically a stretched 737/727 fuselage in any case perhaps we should have had the 757 MIN instead of the 737 MAX- no, doesn't sound so saleable does it?

I never flew the 737 officially, it was always called the FLUF which stood for Fat Little Ugly F---r which was my feelings about it. My order of preference for the Boeings (in order of fun to fly not ease) would be 727, 747-400, 747 Classic, 757, 767-200, 767-100. I would have been a very happy camper flying a 757 derivative.

.
the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible.

User avatar
Undried Plum
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 7308
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 8:45 pm
Location: 56°N 4°W

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#446 Post by Undried Plum » Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:39 pm

boing wrote:
Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:18 pm
Order of preference for the Boeings (in order of fun to fly not ease) would be 727, 747-400, 747 Classic, 757, 767-200, 767-100.
Just imagine having to do three different Type Ratings for that lot!

Oh! The Humanity!

User avatar
boing
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 2714
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:32 am
Location: Beautful Oregon USA
Gender:
Age: 77

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#447 Post by boing » Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:54 am

Plum.

The 727 rating was fun but challenging because it was probably your first left-hand seat job. The Classic rating was an absolute hoot from beginning to end, never laughed or had so much fun in training, it was always referred to as a "Gentleman's Course". The 400 was fun because they had not converted to the computer based training for the aircraft yet. The 757 and 767 training was bloody miserable. Sit down at a computer, each aspect of the training was dealt with in a block, you were forced to complete the whole boring stream of drivel before you were allowed to take the test. You took the the test immediately after the training block was complete and it was multiple choice designed so that any moron who had managed to stay awake through the previous training block would find the questions completely obvious. Of course, very few people remembered any of the training in that block two weeks later. You barely saw an instructor in the first half of the course and if you did he was probably an inexperienced text spouter.

You will gather I do not think much of modern electric jet training, too bloody right I don't. I hand flew a 757 on a two and a half hour leg one day and the co-pilot had the cheek to ask me what I was trying to prove. Apparently the idea of maintaining hand flying skills was completely foreign to him but, in fact, as much use of the autopilot as possible WAS company policy.

.
the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible.

User avatar
ian16th
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 10029
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
Gender:
Age: 87

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#448 Post by ian16th » Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:00 pm

Cynicism improves with age

User avatar
OFSO
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 18702
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:39 pm
Location: Teddington UK and Roses Catalunia
Gender:
Age: 80

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#449 Post by OFSO » Sun Apr 21, 2019 7:08 am

The New York Times has an interesting article on poor quality control at the South Carolina "Dreamliner" production facility. Boeing seems to spend more time and money attacking whistleblowers who are reporting tools and debris left in aircraft than in fixing the problem.

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5497
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 75

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#450 Post by barkingmad » Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:22 am

Poor Quality Control issues dating back to the start of this decade resulting in whistleblowers being persecuted and prosecuted have been dogging Mr B's company for some time.
I was disturbed in 2011, whilst a line dog on some of the older NGs, to stumble across the rather unusual named company and the "fixes" employed to cope with the out-of-tolerance fuselage hoops and bearstraps as supplied to the assembly line.
http://timtate.co.uk/blog/how-safe-is-your-plane/
Some good breakfast reading to curdle the milk in the muesli?! :-o

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5497
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 75

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#451 Post by barkingmad » Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:26 am

And this from 2006.......

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chicag ... y,amp.html

And apparently they make or made parts for Mr A's airframes too so the sidestick wigglers need not feel complacent.

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5497
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 75

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#452 Post by barkingmad » Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:37 am

And so it goes on........

https://www.aljazeera.com/mritems/Docum ... ,_2000.pdf

Where's that darkened room......? :-o

User avatar
barkingmad
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5497
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:13 pm
Location: Another Planet
Gender:
Age: 75

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#453 Post by barkingmad » Sun Apr 21, 2019 6:06 pm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ ... 41a1068693

On reading this I found my evening G&T tasted distinctly of pi55.
Must give up reading. :ymtongue:

Slasher

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#454 Post by Slasher » Mon Apr 22, 2019 1:02 am

I'll read that on Wed when I have my day off.

User avatar
ian16th
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 10029
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:35 am
Location: KZN South Coast with the bananas
Gender:
Age: 87

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#455 Post by ian16th » Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:59 pm

Todays Bulletin

Is the FAA running scared of being seen as Boeing's Agent?
Cynicism improves with age

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17252
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#456 Post by Boac » Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:13 am

From CNN:

"The FAA tells CNN it received the four hotline submissions on April 5, and it may be opening up an entirely new investigative angle into what went wrong in the crashes of two Boeing 737 Max commercial airliners -- Lion Air flight 620 in October and Ethiopian Air flight 302 in March.
Among the complaints is a previously unreported issue involving damage to the wiring of the angle of attack sensor by a foreign object, according to the source.
Boeing has reportedly had previous issues with foreign object debris in its manufacturing process; The New York Times reported metal shavings were found near wiring of Boeing 787 Dreamliner planes, and the Air Force stopped deliveries of the Boeing KC-46 tanker after foreign object debris was found in some of the planes coming off the production line.

Other reports by the whistleblowers involve concerns about the MCAS control cut-out switches, which disengage the MCAS software, according to the source."

User avatar
Rwy in Sight
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 6749
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:04 pm
Location: Lost in an FIR somewhere
Gender:

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#457 Post by Rwy in Sight » Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:01 am

boing wrote:
Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:18 pm

There is a precedent for this aircraft layout, it was called the 757. Why not play games with certification of a 757 type rather than further stretch the 737 concept? Since the 757 fuselage is basically a stretched 737/727 fuselage in any case perhaps we should have had the 757 MIN instead of the 737 MAX- no, doesn't sound so saleable does it?

I never flew the 737 officially, it was always called the FLUF which stood for Fat Little Ugly F---r which was my feelings about it. My order of preference for the Boeings (in order of fun to fly not ease) would be 727, 747-400, 747 Classic, 757, 767-200, 767-100. I would have been a very happy camper flying a 757 derivative.

.
I loved the officially part.

A lot of airlines use the 737 one based in the great State of Texas come to mind and they wouldn't care to acquire a 757 MIN.

Boac
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17252
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:12 pm
Location: Here

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#458 Post by Boac » Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:27 am

As has been said many times before, the 757 production line is DEAD and is most unlikely to be re-jigged! It is history, like the 707/727.

Slasher

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#459 Post by Slasher » Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:37 am

boing wrote:
Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:18 pm
I never flew the 737 officially, it was always called the FLUF which stood for Fat Little Ugly F---r which was my feelings about it.
How does one get to fly a blinkin' 737 unofficially? :p

Agree with the 737-100/200 being FLUFs (I flew the 200) but the 400 and 800 didn't look that bad. The 800 was like the 400 but with the annoying bugs taken out e.g. AC gennys powering direct to the xfer busses and not the main busses 1 and 2.

User avatar
boing
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 2714
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:32 am
Location: Beautful Oregon USA
Gender:
Age: 77

Re: ET crash ADD NBO

#460 Post by boing » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:06 pm

"A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away....",
:-$ :-$

.
the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible.

Post Reply