Coronabollocks..

[OFSO]

https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/incre ... rts-180274

[flyboy22]

It’s rather late and hence this is a short post but with a link to what in fact describes what has been going on and as requested by someone, names of the perpetrators.

I’ve no doubt there will be those here, who want written evidence to be produced before they will believe what they hear and see in the video. Perhaps if you write to some of those people in the video, they may take the time to provide you with said paperwork evidence. But for me, I’m quite happy with the way they’re hopefully taking things, and maybe in the not too distant future we will see the criminals brought to justice. Using their their very own ‘paperwork trail’ against them.

Please listen and watch the video, it is around 17min in length. And please perhaps consider carefully the information that is revealed, before volunteering for any medical procedures, that you most likely do not need.

[flyboy22]

And another….

[prospector]

There would appear to be many highly qualified medical people who have been claiming the dangers of these so called vaccines for many months.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... avir-cola/

"Story at a glance:

So far, all of the drugs developed against COVID-19 have been disastrous in one way or another. Remdesivir, which to this day is the primary COVID drug approved for use in U.S. hospitals, routinely causes severe organ damage and, often, death.
Despite that, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved remdesivir for in-hospital and outpatient use in children as young as 1 month old.
Another COVID drug, Paxlovid, will in some cases cause the infection to rebound when the medication is withdrawn.
Molnupiravir (sold under the brand name Lagevrio) also has serious safety concerns. Not only might it contribute to cancer and birth defects, it may also supercharge the rate at which the virus mutates inside the patient, resulting in newer and more resistant variants.
The fact that U.S. health authorities have focused on these drugs to the exclusion of all others, including older drugs with high rates of effectiveness and superior safety profiles, sends a very disturbing message. They’ve basically become extensions of the drug industry, protecting the drug industry’s interests at the cost of public health."

[admin2]

FB22 - thank you for providing some names and the way you have done so. I echo your view

maybe in the not too distant future we will see the criminals brought to justice.

(except I would prefer 'possible criminals'). At what stage is this proposed action against them? If you can keep us updated with current progress that would be good for all of us. Establishing any time point from the videos is difficult since they do refer to 2017 in places. Certainly the suggestion that the 'Wuhan' virus was planned is alarming (particularly around the 9 min mark in video 1.) This whole issue is one that needs to be either proven or put to bed.

The figures quoted for the effects of Remdesivir are concerning. I also remember Dr John Campbell's coverage in his videos of his (unsuccessful) 2020 attempts to have full clinical trials on Ivermectin in the UK, and I did contact the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care at the time in support of trials. Again, unsuccessfully.

[flyboy22]

Thank you ‘Admin2’, and others, who took the time to try and contact their MPs or Secretary of State for Health. I did the same to my MP (twice) and never got a reply.

And yes I agree ‘possible criminals’ or ‘alleged criminals’, would be the ‘correct’ term to use for these dangerous parasites.

I will continue researching for and listening to the many people who are striving for justice to be carried out against the perpetrators of these crimes. Crimes that have been committed against all of us, under the guise of a ‘pandemic’.

And I think the evidence is clear and proven, from the video (No 1), and others, that the ‘Wuhan virus’ was ‘gain of function’ and planned. Sen. Rand Paul has accused Fauci (with copies of Fauci’s emails in his hand) in Senate Hearings, of exactly that on more than one occasion. That evidence just needs to be aired in an unbiased court.

[admin2]

And I think the evidence is clear and proven, from the video (No 1), and others, that the ‘Wuhan virus’ was ‘gain of function’ and planned.

It appears so, but I do not accept 'clear and proven', though I would wish it were tested. All 'evidence' available to us is only 'hearsay' on video.

That evidence just needs to be aired in an unbiased court.

That I do accept.

It should be remember that Dr Martin has a company ('M-CAM') which makes a lot of money out of patent investigation and other stuff. I am concerned that there has been no progress I can find on investigation of this matter. Even Rand Paul appears to have gone 'silent' since June last year.

[barkingmad]

Admin2 sez:---"thank you for providing some names and the way you have done so. I echo your view..."

Well, since you seem obsessed with names, here's a few (more) to consider;

-Mukesh D. Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Industries
· Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees WEF
· Mark Carney, UN Special Envoy for Climate Action
· Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Canada
· Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the IMF
· Queen Rania of Jordan
· David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, Carlyle Group
· Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, WEF
· Marc Benioff, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Salesforce
· Thomas Buberl, CEO, AXA
· Laurence Fink, Chairman & CEO, BlackRock
· Orit Gadiesh, Chairman, Bain & Company
· Fabiola Gianotti, Director General, CERN
· L. Rafael Reif, President of MIT
· Mark Schneider, CEO, Nestlé
· Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Defense Minister, Singapore
· Robert Mercer, Renaissance Fund
· Larry Page, Google
· Al Gore, Environmentalist
· Angel Gurría, Secretary General OECD
· Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information Communication Technology, Rwanda
· Yo-Yo Ma, Cellist
· Luis Alberto Moreno, WEF
· Jim Hagemann Snabe, Chairman of Siemens and of Maersk
· Feike Sijbesma, Philco
· Zhu Min, Deputy Managing Director, IMF
· Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook/Meta
· Bill Gates, Microsoft
· Herman Gref, CEO, Sberbank
· André Hoffmann, Vice-Chairman Hoffman-La Roche
· Christine Lagarde, President, European Central Bank
· Peter Maurer, President, Red Cross
· Patrice Motsepe, Chairman, African Rainbow Minerals
· Julie Sweet, CEO, Accenture
· Heizo Takenaka, Economist
· Dustin Moskovitz, Open Philanthropy

And what is your problem with Dr David E Martin, who has been tracking this theatre de la merde since 1999 and part of his companie's activities was to monitor practices and breaches of bioweapons contracts.

Neil Ferguson escapes scrutiny here but I pray he'll be amongst the last into the tumbrils.

William Gates Esq does not seem to feature here, but he gets entire videos to himself which might interest some here...

[barkingmad]

But do we ever learn from history?

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/coron ... ine-166116

Apparently not, even in so-called First World countries let alone Africa and India.

Edited to add: - - - Another example of US medical practice;

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/histo ... egee-study

And the scale of the current Phase 3 trials of the so-called Covid "vaccine" puts this lack of BLM into the shade!

[admin2]

BM - an interesting list of names. What are you saying they have done? Committed some crime? If you recall the request was to name those accused of 'genocide' and 'murder'. Are you responding to

So - name the 'evil killers' hinted at in the Martin video.

If that is your claim, there could well be problems with your post unless you can substantiate the accusations. Is it?

[Boac]

BM - regarding the Corona Virus vaccines, I did ask you

Any theories on what could have caused the reported "1 in 8" myocarditis events in the largely unvaccinated people? What are the figures for the ratio now-a-days, post vaccination?

Can you answer that question?

[barkingmad]

BM - regarding the Corona Virus vaccines, I did ask you

Any theories on what could have caused the reported "1 in 8" myocarditis events in the largely unvaccinated people? What are the figures for the ratio now-a-days, post vaccination?

Can you answer that question?

Yes.

One problem with the (mainly) US figures is their stipulation that one is NOT classified as “vaccinated” until 14 days or more after the ‘stab’.

So it’s quite acceptable in that dystopian world for a ‘stab’ victim to drop dead or become seriously adversely affected, within hours or even minutes of the needle insertion, but of course they have not been “vaccinated”.

You knew that already, didn’t you, so why ask the question?

And if you were unaware of that statistical ‘fudge’, then you have not been keeping up to speed with the scam.

Therefore with such crackpot criteria being employed to supposedly track AEs, it is impossible to maintain accurate records of who died from what, how very convenient for the perpetrators?!

As you are sooh fond of asking questions, I present a rather difficult exam for you and the other Covidiots here to complete to the best of your abilities, extra paper is available and take as long as is needed;

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/100- ... -to-answer

Caution: Answers which involve the use of any form of ‘modelling’ will result in marks being deducted.

Candidates are also permitted to refer to “Incriminating Evidence” enclosure in the question paper for assistance if so required!

My own question is: With the rapid rollout and complete absence of medium to long term “vaccine” side-effects trials never completed and with a “state of emergency” no longer current, what happened to the ‘Precautionary Principle’, a precaution for which you chided me way back in those golden days of lockdowns, masks, anti-social distancing and all the other pantomime garbage which has conveniently been forgotten?

[admin2]

Can you answer that question?

Yes.

No. I see no figures to support.

In any case I'm tired of your relentless rabid posting on this topic and total negativity on just about anything else. The number of members actively replying to your posts here is very small - 4 maybe 5 at most.

Now then - in the process of taking over I discussed several things with Alison. She informed me that she was seriously considering deleting the membership of those who only post in Politics and Controversial Topics (that would, of course, include you). I have not done that (as you will personally have noticed).

However, due to the incessant barrage of negativity you produce I am blocking you from posting in that forum for 2 weeks, effective 26/1/23. You are free to post (if you can?) anything constructive in any other forum, but be warned should you try to sneak in something which should be in Politics and Controversial Topics you will be further restricted. I do not think the site will be adversely affected for the 2 weeks.

[flyboy22]

Hi Admin2....I may be accused of being too generous or naïve here, but I think that BM (who's been banned) is perhaps trying to do something here to help save people's lives. It would seem that he believes, from the wealth of data and evidence given by eminently qualified physicians, lawyers and researchers, that people could be at risk of dying or being maimed from these so-called 'vaccines'. I see that attempt to help save lives, as a good cause.

In fact, I have the same wish to help others. Thankfully, some people I have spoken with and shown the data to, have themselves gone on to carry out their own research using their own contacts and methods, and have arrived at the same conclusion. They are also seriously worried about the 'vaccines' and what they are doing to people who have taken them. Plus the long-term affects are obviously as yet totally unknown.

And this is for a 'vaccine' that 'the elite' want everyone to take. For a virus which clearly does not greatly affect the young and/or the healthy. The question "Why" should be asked. And at the highest level. But it is not being asked. Why not?

In fact, I've looked at the questions in the link that BM posted. And to be honest, all of these questions should be answered. Should they not? And they should be answered whilst there is a halt in the 'vaccine' program. There are enough doctors, virologists, pathologists, undertakers and other specialists trying to get them stopped. Which in itself should clearly cause 'those in power' to think there might be something wrong, and that there should be a halt whilst a thorough investigation is carried out, and those questions answered once and for all. And it should be publicly done.

All MSM channels should be used to let the public know the answers to the questions. Why do the MSM only preach the 'narrative'? Why do they 'silence' anyone who begins speaking in opposition to the 'narrative'. These are obvious questions which should be answered before any more arms (especially those of children) are jabbed with this stuff. How can anyone disagree with that suggestion.

I hope Admin2, that this posting is taken in the way it's meant. I.e. with people's lives in mind. Those colleagues on here who I may have even sat next to at one time or another. Or had a beer with 'down route' at one time or another. Oh...those were the days!

I can only write about what I have seen and heard during the last 3 years. And I can honestly state that I have seen enough and heard enough from reputable, honest, caring people, to be very concerned about what is happening with regard to these 'vaccines'. And that is how I write here. With the simple wish to help others see and hear the same. And for them to then make their own decisions about what is best for them and their families.

I cannot (with any integrity) remain 'silent', as this would demonstrate a complicity with the 'narrative'. A 'narrative' that many good people are fighting against, and being vilified for doing so.

[admin2]

I cannot (with any integrity) remain 'silent

You have not been so requested.

[OFSO]

Extraordinary statement: that there are an elite who want us to take vaccines. Who are they? Why should they?

[boing]

The answer to your question is that the people who want us to take vaccines are those who benefit financially and from the power they gain.

Answer for yourself one simple question. Why were the people who were paid billions of dollars of taxpayer money to develop a vaccine then allowed to sell to sell it commercially and reap absolutely vast profits and, as a side benefit, be protected from any lawsuits owing to defects in their product?


.

[flyboy22]

I know. And thank you for that. It was to simply explain why I post, rather than 'just staying quiet', as so many medically qualified, eminent people have done/had to do. Many of them have much to lose, as we have seen in other postings. Their licenses, jobs, reputations etc. And sadly, there will be those who know what's going on, and yet say nothing, even as they inject someone with this stuff. Mainly due to fear of the reprisals I mention above.

So in a way, I'm trying to help those medical staff who are frightened to speak out, get the message 'out there', to the 'unknowing', 'narrative' believing public. In other words, many 'narrative' believing people, do not know what they do not know. Simply because they do not search for any additional information or facts, or even an opposing point of view.

They have been very effectively brainwashed into not doing that. They've been told that anyone who speaks out or writes anything against the 'narrative', is a 'granny killer', a 'conspiracy theorist', a 'nutjob' and so on...All of these terms have been used by MSM and government to shut down the dissenting points of view. Viewpoints that are backed by real-world data and science. Or people have been told to only listen to one source for their 'truth'. I.e. Jacinda's "We are the only source of 'truth' you need to hear".

Anyway....enough for now....I've got to prepare for a Burns Night celebration. Cheers....

[bob2s]

Make of this what you will.

[prospector]

Perhaps this is the event referred to.


https://ussanews.com/2023/01/25/%f0%9f% ... -vaccines/

"Project Veritas just released footage of Pfizer’s Director of Research and Development for Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning, Jordon Trishton Walker, admitting Pfizer is exploring mutating the SARS-CoV-2 virus so they can continue to make new mRNA vaccines that match the mutations they create.

Share

Walker says, “Don’t tell anyone…The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys…we successively cause them to keep infecting each other…”. This would force new strains, and opportunities to match new mRNA vaccines.

ussanews.com
Of course that’s not all, Walker continues, “one of the things we’re exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate [COVID] ourselves so we can create……. preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine…… Nobody wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses……”. As you can see, the Pfizer executive understands this is risky behavior. After all, he admits, people don’t want to find out big pharma is mutating viruses."